b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
- To: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Leviticus 20:17
- Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:20:57 -0700
Ishinan:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Ishinan <ishinan AT comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
> Proto- Semitic * lqH. has the primary sense of impregnation. Hence the
> Hebrew "lqkh" does not mean to rape or to take in marriage, but simply to
> impregnate. In other Semitic languages the term can also be used in the
> sense of fecundating palm trees.
>
> Ishinan Ishibashi
>
>
> This looks like a perfect example of the etymological fallacy. What’s
worse, it is taking from a language whose very existence is speculative, not
attested.
It also shows the fallacy of relying on cognate languages, as their meanings
can be very different than Hebrew.
Karl W. Randolph.
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Leviticus 20:17,
Ishinan, 10/22/2009
- Re: [b-hebrew] Leviticus 20:17, K Randolph, 10/23/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.