b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
Re: [b-hebrew] 1Q287 and the Tanakh at Deut. 32:43
- From: TedBro AT aol.com
- To: leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il, b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] 1Q287 and the Tanakh at Deut. 32:43
- Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:24:38 EST
Hi, All:
Interesting discussion...
<<Yigal Levin wrote: As to why neither version appears in the MT - probably
scribal error, simply
"skipping" a line.
Recall that the Massorah dates from the Christian era. Thus another possible
explanation for missing Christian proof texts is that the Massoretes, like
everyone else, had biases and when selecting readings from various
manuscripts
for inclusion in the MT, favored those less favorable to the Christians.
Peace,
Ted Brownstein
In a message dated 1/31/2009 7:25:47 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il writes:
Dear Gary,
Let's please not be cynical. Your question is more about the NT than it is
about the Hebrew Bible.
In any case, it is widely assumed that the writers of the NT used the
Septuagint (or something like what we call the Septuagint) as their "Old
Testament", so it would be only natural for them to quote the Septuagint
version of this verse, which does include the phrase "Be glad, O heavens,
together with Him, and do obeisance to Him, all angels of God". The Qumran
version, at least according to Abegg, Flint and Ulrich's The Dead Sea
Scrolls Bible, is ".... all you gods". If I had to guess, I'd assume that
the Qumran version is earlier, and that the Greek version(s) that we have
today, which are all based on manuscripts that are later than Qumran,
actually "cleaned it up" by replacing "gods" with "angels of God". As to why
neither version appears in the MT - probably scribal error, simply
"skipping" a line.
Yigal Levin
**************From Wall Street to Main Street and everywhere in between, stay
up-to-date with the latest news. (http://aol.com?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000023)
-
[b-hebrew] 1Q287 and the Tanakh at Deut. 32:43,
Gary Hedrick, 01/31/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] 1Q287 and the Tanakh at Deut. 32:43,
Yigal Levin, 01/31/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] 1Q287 and the Tanakh at Deut. 32:43,
Gary Hedrick, 01/31/2009
- Re: [b-hebrew] 1Q287 and the Tanakh at Deut. 32:43, Yigal Levin, 01/31/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] 1Q287 and the Tanakh at Deut. 32:43,
Gary Hedrick, 01/31/2009
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [b-hebrew] 1Q287 and the Tanakh at Deut. 32:43, TedBro, 01/31/2009
-
Re: [b-hebrew] 1Q287 and the Tanakh at Deut. 32:43,
Yigal Levin, 01/31/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.