Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] Minimalism is dead

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: LM Barre <l_barre AT yahoo.com>
  • To: b-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] Minimalism is dead
  • Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:59:27 -0800 (PST)

I saw a program on the history channel showing the minimalism was death. 
"The Hebrew writings are supposed to be a justification for a kingdom that
never existed?  Dever said that on the program.  The siliver scroll is clear
proof of a vital literary tradiltion that was pre-exilic at least.  So I hope
we can stop wasting time over twice dead minimalism.  I wish that I knew the
name of the program to pass on.  My apologies.


Lloyd Barre'
 
LM Barré
Herald of the Living God
http://freewebs.com/lmbarre
 



>From kwrandolph AT gmail.com Fri Jan 23 12:36:22 2009
Return-Path: <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix, from userid 3002)
id 3B8784C020; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:36:22 -0500 (EST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on malecky
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE
autolearn=disabled version=3.2.3
Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com
[209.85.134.189])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B418B4C01F
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:36:21 -0500
(EST)
Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so3099407mue.0
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:36:20 -0800
(PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.235.10 with SMTP id i10mr2093772bkh.58.1232732180804; Fri,
23 Jan 2009 09:36:20 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:36:20 -0800
Message-ID: <acd782170901230936i6671b739xd650d3ab54dcc327 AT mail.gmail.com>
From: K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
To: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:06:41 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.9
Subject: [b-hebrew] XRH, XRR two roots or one?
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Biblical Hebrew Forum <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:36:22 -0000

Dear B-Hebrew Chavurim:

In connection with another discussion I looked again at these two roots and
was struck by the similarity of usage, meaning and even form. Is it possible
that these are recognized as separate roots only on the basis of the
Masoretic points, without which they would be considered one root?

What think ye?

Karl W. Randolph.



  • [b-hebrew] Minimalism is dead, LM Barre, 01/23/2009

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page