Biblical Hebrew Forum

[jmlineb AT comcast.net (John M. Linebarger)]

I hope your question didn't get lost in the "Sodom Wars" postings ...

Anyway, I have Leupold's "Exposition of Daniel," and he is always referring 
to K. S. as well.  I've done some digging, and I think he is referring to the 
book below; he distinguishes Koenig's Wordbook from Koenig's Syntax by using 
K. W. instead of K. S.
K. S. is Eduard Koenig’s grammar Lehrgebaude der Hebraischen Sprache: Part II 
Syntax (Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1897).
Hope this helps.  Do others think that it is correct as well?
John M. Linebarger, PhD (Computer Science)
Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
>From smille10 AT sbcglobal.net  Fri Nov 28 00:01:34 2008
Return-Path: <smille10 AT sbcglobal.net>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix, from userid 3002)
        id 9AE564C01B; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:01:34 -0500 (EST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on malecky
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled
        version=3.2.3
Received: from smtp121.sbc.mail.re3.yahoo.com (smtp121.sbc.mail.re3.yahoo.com
        [66.196.96.94])
        by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B55464C015
        for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:01:33 -0500 
(EST)
Received: (qmail 87711 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2008 05:01:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO dell2) (smille10 AT 69.209.136.96 with login)
        by smtp121.sbc.mail.re3.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Nov 2008 05:01:32 
-0000
X-YMail-OSG: 
aN4OJk8VM1n6MiZs5c23kvQmCTSqdbiqF73sCKwBMSA_T7HMm5oIR4sbM_rHaxmQbX3Y8Y_1lEwYyIGyqeNCrYM5mfuFAbtSs30aKOjrUtPy4LgAN3YUbIJ1JjLzrURugaakuudckSNXhMLM3XlfSvB0QMAcvP9WVwKqM57fchz_qMeKx_YlYpjigGA-
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
From: "Steve Miller" <smille10 AT sbcglobal.net>
To: "'Daniel Rodriguez'" <dlr09 AT earthlink.net>,
        <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
References: 
<9463359.1227816608889.JavaMail.root AT mswamui-cedar.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:01:46 -0500
Message-ID: <1B46EA6A3A6D4ADCB052832A99D3D07A@dell2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: 
<9463359.1227816608889.JavaMail.root AT mswamui-cedar.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
Thread-Index: AclQzCiDhCzrZDsnQse+HLLdhWBHPQANhLMg
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] b-hebrew Digest, Vol 71, Issue 21
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: steve AT voiceInWilderness.info
List-Id: Biblical Hebrew Forum <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 05:01:35 -0000


> From: Daniel Rodriguez
> 
> Steve,
> 
> I use the biblical Qumran module on Accordance.
> Its not just that the BHS has a defective holem and the DSS does not. Its
> that the BHS has only one defective holem amidst full spellings with holem
> vav. Why the short spelling only once?
> 
> daniel
> _______________________________________________
[Steve Miller] Thanks Daniel.
Yes, I knew that what I said wasn't much of an answer to your question. That
was about all I knew related to your question. I really only replied to ask
how to see the DSS Psalms in Hebrew, which you answered.

Since you have access to the DSS Hebrew text, could you search for le-olam
with the defective holem and tell me how many occurrences there are? I
expect there would be very few. Thanks.

Here's a couple other related things that I thought of:

If you compare 2 Sam 22 to Psalm 18, there are 21 defective holems in 2 Sam
22 which are full holems in Ps 18, none of which are in vv 26-34.
There are only 3 defective holems in Ps 18 which are full holems in 2 Sam
22, all of them in vv 26 - 34. 
I had made a letter to letter comparison of the Hebrew of Ps 18 to 2 Sam 22
at www.voiceinwilderness.info -> Psalms -> Psalm 18 -> click here to open in
a new window

There are 19 le-olam's with defective holem in BHS compared with 155 lolam's
with full holem. 
There are 18 le-olam's with defective holem in Allepo. The only one missing
is Ps 136:3.

-Steve Miller
Detroit
www.voiceinwilderness.info