b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Shoshanna Walker <rosewalk AT concentric.net>
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Cc: JCR128 AT student.anglia.ac.uk
- Subject: [b-hebrew] The 'need' for a king?
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:02:39 -0400
Then think a little harder, because the "need" for a king was because G-d (and not any human representatives/ 'authors' of the Torah) COMMANDED - once we possessed and settled our Land - that we appoint a G-d chosen (ie; with the concurrence of both a prophet and the Sanhedrin) king with certain qualifications, which are described.
Ie; it was not only permitted, but it was COMMANDED that at some future point, when we were established in our land that we request a king.
Devarim 17: 14, 15
Shoshanna
In fact, now I think of it, there is absolutely nothing
I can think of in the hebrew canon that would ever
lead anyone to believe that the conversion to regal
system was considered an improvement by Yhwh and his
representatives, the authors of the canon.
James Christian Read
BSc Computer Science (thesis: concept driven machine translation using the Aleppo codex)
http://www.lamie.org/hebrew
Furthermore, the
regal system proved to be no less flawed and perhaps
even more so than the period of the Judges. They then
also had to start paying tax as a result of their
faithless request for a king.
In fact, now I think of it, there is absolutely nothing
I can think of in the hebrew canon that would ever
lead anyone to believe that the convers
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
-
[b-hebrew] The 'need' for a king?,
Shoshanna Walker, 08/15/2007
- Re: [b-hebrew] The 'need' for a king?, Yigal Levin, 08/15/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.