Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] verb forms--perfect as future

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: <michaelabernat9001 AT sbcglobal.net>
  • To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] verb forms--perfect as future
  • Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:47:09 -0500

I know some of the members reject the idea that the perfect is used for the
future so I spent a few minutes examining some of the passages used to
support this concept.
While I can understand how some of these passages may be considered a matter
of interpretation, there were two that I could not see how the perfect could
be translated as a past tense--Ruth 4:3 and 2 Kings 5:20.
Ruth 4:3 reads
3 וַיֹּאמֶר לַגֹּאֵל חֶלְקַת הַשָּׂדֶה אֲשֶׁר לְאָחִינוּ לֶאֱלִימֶלֶךְ
מָכְרָה נָעֳמִי הַשָּׁבָה מִ‍שְּׂדֵה מוֹאָב׃

Rth 4:3 And he said unto the near kinsman: 'Naomi, that is come back out of
the field of Moab, SELLETH the parcel of land, which was our brother
Elimelech's;

I can't see how you could translate sells as a past tense. Verse 4 makes it
plain that the property has not been sold yet. I can understand how one could
take this as a present tense-- "Naomi is in the process of selling" or as a
future "Naomi will sell." But "Naomi sold" seems to be excluded by context.

2 Kings 5:20 reads


20 וַיֹּאמֶר גֵּיחֲזִי נַעַר אֱלִישָׁע אִישׁ־הָאֱלֹהִים הִנֵּה חָשַׂךְ
אֲדֹנִי אֶת־נַעֲמָן הָאֲרַמִּי הַזֶּה מִ‍קַּחַת מִ‍יָּדוֹ אֵת אֲשֶׁר־הֵבִיא
חַי־יְהוָה כִּי־אִם־רַצְתִּי אַחֲרָיו וְלָקַחְתִּי מֵ‍אִתּוֹ מְאוּמָה׃



2Ki 5:20 But Gehazi, the servant of Elisha the man of God, said: 'Behold, my
master hath spared this Naaman the Aramean, in not receiving at his hands
that which he brought; as the LORD liveth, I will surely RUN after him, and
take somewhat of him.'



Verse 20 describes what Gehazi plans to do. He does not carry through with
this action until the following verse.

Sincerely,

Michael Abernathy





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page