b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re:Nun-Tav-Vetroot
- From: Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu>
- To: stoneyb <stoneyb AT touchwood.net>
- Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re:Nun-Tav-Vetroot
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 22:28:07 -0500
All a pronoun is is a universal identity marker, and is therefore meaningful in all the cases I brought up. Notice that the equality does not say er=are.
Isaac Fried
On Nov 27, 2006, at 2:56 PM, stoneyb wrote:
The English 'er' in prisoner=prison+er=prison+are is likewise a personal
pronoun.
A) 'prisoner' brought its suffix over from French
B) '-er' has never had anything to do with 'are'. Different stem
altogether
C) characterizing an agentive affix as a 'pronoun' does makes a kind of
metaphoric sense, but at the price of making the term 'pronoun'
virtually meaningless.
Stoney Breyer
Writer/Touchwood, Inc.
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
-
[b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re:Nun-Tav-Vet root,
Isaac Fried, 11/25/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re:Nun-Tav-Vetroot,
stoneyb, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re:Nun-Tav-Vetroot,
Isaac Fried, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re:Nun-Tav-Vetroot,
stoneyb, 11/28/2006
- Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re:Nun-Tav-Vetroot, Isaac Fried, 11/29/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re:Nun-Tav-Vetroot,
stoneyb, 11/28/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re:Nun-Tav-Vetroot,
Isaac Fried, 11/27/2006
-
Re: [b-hebrew] comparative historical linguistics was Re:Nun-Tav-Vetroot,
stoneyb, 11/27/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.