b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
- To: Vadim Cherny <VadimCherny AT mail.ru>
- Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] LXX transliterations
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:58:20 +0100
On 16/10/2005 13:41, Vadim Cherny wrote:
No, Vadim. My position is that probably the KPT letters (i.e. the unvoiced BGDKPT) in Hebrew were aspirated plosives (like most English ones, rather than the Russian plosives which are almost unaspirated at least in the best Moscow pronunciation), which at some uncertain time became fricatives in intervocalic position. Aspiration is not late, fricativisation might be.
...
(A note for Peter: Joel's examples show that as early as the LXX, begedkefet
were aspirated. In a discussion about schwa some time ago you preferred the
view, if I recall correctly, that the aspiration is a late phenomenon.)
--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/
-
[b-hebrew] LXX transliterations,
Dr. Joel M. Hoffman, 10/14/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] LXX transliterations,
Vadim Cherny, 10/16/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] LXX transliterations, Dr. Joel M. Hoffman, 10/16/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] LXX transliterations, Peter Kirk, 10/17/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [b-hebrew] LXX transliterations, Dr. Joel M. Hoffman, 10/14/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] LXX transliterations,
Vadim Cherny, 10/16/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.