Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] spaces or no spaces

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Harold R. Holmyard III" <hholmyard AT ont.com>
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] spaces or no spaces
  • Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 07:48:06 -0500

Dear Susan,

The DSS had spaces between words, but sometimes they are pretty small, if I remember, so confusion can occur.

Yours,
Harold Holmyard

Greetings b-hebrew folk --

I teach an Introduction to Biblical Studies course, and I've been trying to
find out what's the evidence for whether the earliest Hebrew Bible
manuscripts were written with or without spaces in between the words. Can
you help?

I've found several web pages that claim "no spaces" but they don't cite any
evidence (e.g. ancient manuscripts).

I really don't care all that much what the actual answer is -- but I sure
would like to know what the EVIDENCE is, one way or another. And the basis
for the assertions one way or the other.

Here's what I've found so far, on both sides (spaces vs no spaces):

SPACES:

(1) My recollection of the Qumran Isaiah Scroll from when I saw it in the
Israel Museum in Jerusalem; I'm pretty sure it had spaces between the words.

(2) Wikipedia has this to say,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interword_separation:
"Interword separation is the set of symbol or spacing conventions used by
the <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki//wiki/Orthography>orthography of a script
to separate words. According to Paul Saenger in Spaces between Words, the
early <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki//wiki/Semitic_language>Semitic
languages - which had no vowel signs - had interword separations, but
languages with vowels (principally
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki//wiki/Greek_language>Greek and
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki//wiki/Latin>Latin) lost the separation, not
regaining it until much later."
I've requested this book by Saenger through interlibrary loan...

(3) Another Dead Sea Scroll fragment I found on line that appears to have
interword spaces is at
http://www.ibiblio.org/expo/deadsea.scrolls.exhibit/full-images/hosea-b.gif

My thinking is that the Dead Sea Scrolls are the oldest extant Hebrew
manuscripts of the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament, so if the DSS documents have
spaces, that confirms the "spaces" side, as far as we know.

NO SPACES:

Here are a couple of web pages that claim there were no spaces between words:

(1)
http://www.rotten.com/library/religion/bible/historical-construction/ot-errata/

"First, prior to the 6th century A.D., the written Tanach consisted
primarily of consonants. To be able to actually translate the written text
into understandable and meaningful words, one would have to receive special
instruction by a teacher or rabbi. Knowledge of this correct interpretation
or reading was passed down orally from teachers to students over the
generations. Second, as if to further confuse matters, words were written
without spaces in between. Thus knowledge of where one word ended and
another began was, as with vowel sounds, dependent on the oral tradition."

(2) at http://home.earthlink.net/~ddstuhlman/crc64.htm :

"Even though the scribes were very careful variations have crept into the
text. One reason is that the original Torah scrolls were in the ancient
Hebrew characters without spaces between the words and without final letters."

I'm sure this is a naive question, but I don't have any obvious way to find
out the answer besides asking you-all.

Thanks!




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page