Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] The translation of ehyeh

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "B. M. Rocine" <brocine AT twcny.rr.com>
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] The translation of ehyeh
  • Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 14:01:34 -0400

Hi Harold,

Harold R. Holmyard III wrote:

Alviero Niccacci wrote:
Exod. 3:14a should then be translated: "I will be [first-place, volitive
yiqtol: I promise I will be, i.e. for you] what I was [yiqtol for habitual
past, i.e. or your Fathers]."


HH: To me this is odd translation, taking the same verb and giving it two different interpretations within three words.


You are seeing the neatness of the Niccacci model. To him, the type of clause and the position within the clause are critical to understanding the meaning of a verb form. It would be great, if you would want to learn more about Niccacci to read his "A Neglected Point of Hebrew Syntax: _yiqtol_ and position in the sentence." Liber Anus (1987) 39:310-327. It may be available on the net.

In summary, a yiqtol in first position (the first ehyeh) is volitional, but yiqtol in a dependent clause (the second ehyeh) expresses future or habitual past.

I have studied all the weyiqtols in the Tanakh as a means of testing Niccacci's claims about clause-initial yiqtols and found them to be 98% volitional or ambiguous (IOW only 2% clear counter-examples).

Shalom,
Bryan

--
B. M. Rocine
Living Word Chruch
6101 Court St. Rd.
Syracuse, NY 13026
(W): 315.437.6744




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page