b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
Re: [b-hebrew] What do you think of these ideas on "YAHWEH" and "RUACH"? (Travis Jackson)
- From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
- To: trepp AT telus.net
- Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] What do you think of these ideas on "YAHWEH" and "RUACH"? (Travis Jackson)
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 11:36:27 +0100
On 26/05/2005 06:39, trepp AT telus.net wrote:
...No, it is one of those "special cases". The argument here seems to be that the divine name is the qal "imperfect", third person masculine singular, of HWH. But according to the regular rule for verbs with a guttural first radical, the first vowel is patah (a) rather than hiriq (i). Admittedly there seems to be some variation when the first radical is he: in HYH but apparently no other case the first vowel is hiriq; in some others e.g. HGH, HDP, HMH the first vowel is segol (e); whereas others e.g. HPK, HRG, HRH, HRS, HLK when not contracted follow the rule for gutturals, with patah. So, we can conclude that we cannot be sure what form the qal "imperfect", third person masculine singular, of HWH would take, but the chances are that it would be either YAHWE or YEHWE (each with a final he mater lectionis), and the only reason for thinking it might be YIHWE is an assumption that HWH would be irregular in the same way as HYH just because the verbs are apparent synonyms.
first poster again:
_______ wrote: but what about the prefix Yi? Where do you obtain the phonetic 'i'?
The Y is the prefix used in the third person in this particular tense (usually thought of as future, but that's not exactly accurate) in every single verb in the Hebrew language, no exceptions. When the verb is of the simple construction, as is the case here, then the first vowel is i except in some special cases, which I don't want to get into here, because H's name is not one of those special cases.
I note for completeness that the *hiphil* "imperfect", third person masculine singular, of HWH would also be YAHWE, and thus this pronunciation, the one preferred by many scholars, might mean either "he is" or "he causes to be". I understand that "first poster" prefers the non-causative sense, apparently because of the parallel with the unambiguously (as pointed) non-causative first person form 'EHYE "I am" of Exodus 3:14.
--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 266.11.17 - Release Date: 25/05/2005
-
[b-hebrew] What do you think of these ideas on "YAHWEH" and "RUACH"? (Travis Jackson),
trepp, 05/26/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] What do you think of these ideas on "YAHWEH" and "RUACH"? (Travis Jackson), Peter Kirk, 05/26/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.