b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: CS Bartholomew <jacksonpollock AT earthlink.net>
- To: hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [b-hebrew] Joash Inscription, a blatant forgery?
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:30:26 -0800
What are first impressions worth? The first time I saw "The Joash
Inscription" was the image found at Giuseppe Regalzi's excellent web site:
http://www.orientalisti.net/ioash.htm
My immediate reaction to the visual data? It looks too good to be true.
Reading some of the articles linked to this page I ran into the following
quote from *R.Altman:
quote:
Every element of the tablet is clear; one neither requires a transcription
to read the text nor needs other equipment to examine the tablet. The
technical term for a forgery that can be seen by the eye without special
equipment is "blatant."
:end quote
The word "blatant" captures my immediate subjective reaction quiet nicely.
Of course, immediate subjective reactions are not "science" but having
several decades of experience with con artists this stone looks
superficially like a clumsy attempt to "pull a fast one."
greetings,
Clay Bartholomew
*Report on the Temple Tablet
By Dr. Rochelle I. Altman
February 2003
http://www.bibleinterp.com/articles/report_temple_tablet.htm
-
[b-hebrew] Joash Inscription, a blatant forgery?,
CS Bartholomew, 03/17/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Joash Inscription, a blatant forgery?,
Peter Kirk, 03/17/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Joash Inscription, a blatant forgery?, CS Bartholomew, 03/17/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Joash Inscription, a blatant forgery?,
Dave Washburn, 03/17/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Joash Inscription, a blatant forgery?,
CS Bartholomew, 03/17/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Joash Inscription, a blatant forgery?, Stephen Goranson, 03/18/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Joash Inscription, a blatant forgery?,
CS Bartholomew, 03/17/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Joash Inscription, a blatant forgery?,
Peter Kirk, 03/17/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.