b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Ken Penner" <pennerkm AT mcmaster.ca>
- To: "'Harold R. Holmyard III'" <hholmyard AT ont.com>, "'b-hebrew'" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Cc:
- Subject: RE: [b-hebrew] Fw: Aramaic to them?
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:18:57 -0500
To voice my agreement with Harold on the point of languages in use in the
first century, the presence of non-literary Hebrew notes among the Dead Sea
Scrolls (besides the Qumran DSS), in conjunction with Segal's proofs in _A
Grammar of Mishnaic Hebrew_ should leave no doubt that Hebrew was a spoken
language at the time.
Opinions to the contrary are the remnant of scholarship undertaken before
Segal's grammar (1927) and before the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls (c.
50 years ago), as I argue in a presentation to the CSBS last year,
http://s91279732.onlinehome.us/papers/hebrais
Ken Penner, McMaster/DSS
Dead Sea Scrolls scholars' list owner,
http://mailman.McMaster.CA/mailman/listinfo/g-megillot
> "Jews were probably not speaking Hebrew in the first
> century," said Rabbi
> Ismar Schorsch, chancellor of the Jewish Theological
> Seminary. "They were speaking Aramaic."
-
[b-hebrew] Fw: Aramaic to them?,
Yigal Levin, 02/24/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Fw: Aramaic to them?,
Harold R. Holmyard III, 02/24/2004
- RE: [b-hebrew] Fw: Aramaic to them?, Ken Penner, 02/24/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [b-hebrew] Fw: Aramaic to them?, Deborah Millier, 02/28/2004
- RE: [b-hebrew] Fw: Aramaic to them?, Karl Randolph, 02/28/2004
-
RE: [b-hebrew] Fw: Aramaic to them?,
Karl Randolph, 02/28/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] Fw: Aramaic to them?, Peter Kirk, 02/28/2004
- [b-hebrew] Fw: Aramaic to them?, Deborah Millier, 02/29/2004
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Fw: Aramaic to them?,
Harold R. Holmyard III, 02/24/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.