Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] meaning of XWT

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Noam Eitan <noameitan AT yahoo.com>
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] meaning of XWT
  • Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 17:01:39 -0700 (PDT)

It means a camp, conjugated as a construct noun. In Numbers 32:41 it is used
as such, as well as a free standing noun. But all the other examples you gave
are of a different word altogether, xwtm (chotam - a signet ring) - the root
is xtm, not xwh as in xwt.

Noam Eitan
Brooklyn, NY


>In the dictionaries I have XWT [chawat] is listed merely as a name, and
most of the time in Tanakh it is used as one, as part of the name XWT
Y)YR, the name of a town east of the Jordan.

However, in five verses, Numbers 32:41, Ezekiel 28:12, Haggai 2:23,
Job 38:14, 41:15 I noticed that it is used apart from the name of the
town. It appears to be something that was built up, not just a natural
phenomenon. Does anyone have a clue to its meaning?

Thanks for your help.

Karl W. Randolph.




---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears
>From jacksonpollock AT earthlink.net Mon Oct 27 16:48:40 2003
Return-Path: <jacksonpollock AT earthlink.net>
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net (stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net
[207.217.120.188])
by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9EF200FE
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 16:48:40 -0500
(EST)
Received: from dialup-67.75.200.141.dial1.seattle.level3.net ([67.75.200.141])
by stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
id 1AEFE6-0005jE-00
for b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 13:48:39 -0800
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.1.2418
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 13:48:55 -0800
From: CS Bartholomew <jacksonpollock AT earthlink.net>
To: hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Message-ID: <BBC2D2C7.1C82%jacksonpollock AT earthlink.net>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace:
4a003e31c918500651d1d9fd3a13d0e594f5150ab1c16ac0175e62059bacab522b6458238a1687f9419b90601635c130350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
Subject: [b-hebrew] Agency
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
List-Id: A forum on the Hebrew Bible, its language and interpretation
<b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:48:40 -0000

Been doing some reading on semantic functional analysis and as a test case
decided to examine how cause and agency are encoded in Biblical Hebrew.
Waltke/O'Conner (11.2.11d #12,#13) give examples of mn marking cause and
agency.

Gen. 9:11 whqmty )t bryty )tkM wl) ykrt kl b#r (wd mmy hmbwl wl) yhyh (wd
mbwl l#xt h)rC

Lev. 21:7 )#h znh wxllh l) yqxw w)#h grw#h m)y#h l) yqxw ky qd# hw) l)lhyw

How do we know that the original audience for this document would have
thought of m)y#h in Lev. 21:7 as the agent? Is it possible that the m)y#h
was understood as the source, i.e., the action grw#h proceeding from the man
in the direction of the woman? In other words can we state categorically
that the spatial notion is lost here and replaced with an abstraction like
agent?

The application of this same question to causation mmy hmbwl in Gen. 9:11
requires only a slight adjustment.

The purpose of this analysis is to come up with a series of semantic
functional categories that can be applied to both Hebrew and Greek (LXX) so
that semantic functional mapping onto surface structure can be studied in
terms of LXX/MT translation equivalents.

greetings,
Clay Bartholomew

Two books I am reading right now which deal with semantic functions are:

Chafe, Wallace L.
Meaning and the Structure of Language
Chicago 1970

Blake, Barry J.
Case (Textbooks in Linguistics )
New York, NY, U.S.A.: Cambridge University Press, 1994.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page