b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Re: [b-hebrew] ALEF-LAMED: NOT Samekh-lamed: Another 2 handwritten examples to clear up the confusion: In ISRAEL and ELIEZER

From: Peter Kirk <peter.r.kirk AT ntlworld.com>
To: Karl Randolph <kwrandolph AT email.com>
Cc: Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] ALEF-LAMED: NOT Samekh-lamed: Another 2 handwritten examples to clear up the confusion: In ISRAEL and ELIEZER
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 02:45:29 -0700

On 10/07/2003 19:26, Karl Randolph wrote:

Dear David Sheby:

Peter Kirk was not the only one who did not recognize what you were talking
about from the first .pdf file, I didn’t see it either. Thanks for the second
file, it cleared it up for me. (I even magnified the first file and all I got
were big, square pixels.)

Karl W. Randolph.

It wasn't me who commented on this. I think it was Yigal.

--
Peter Kirk
peter.r.kirk AT ntlworld.com
http://web.onetel.net.uk/~peterkirk/

Re: [b-hebrew] ALEF-LAMED: NOT Samekh-lamed: Another 2 handwritten examples to clear up the confusion: In ISRAEL and ELIEZER, Karl Randolph, 07/10/2003
- Re: [b-hebrew] ALEF-LAMED: NOT Samekh-lamed: Another 2 handwritten examples to clear up the confusion: In ISRAEL and ELIEZER, Peter Kirk, 07/11/2003