Biblical Hebrew Forum

["frater three" <fraterthree AT lycos.com>]

Dear members,
Are the words BT QWL (Bath Qol) anywhere in the OT/HB? The words 'Bath Qol' 
are translated as "Voice of God", and literally as "daughter of the voice". 
Why is the word daughter related to the "Voice of God"? Is it the same "still 
small voice"? 
Regards,
Fernando



____________________________________________________________
Watch a championship game with Elway or McGwire.
Enter Now at http://champions.lycos.com 

From BillRoss AT norisksoftware.com Sat Oct 12 13:53:33 2002
Return-Path: <BillRoss AT norisksoftware.com>
Received: from trueband.net ([216.163.120.8]) by franklin.oit.unc.edu with 
SMTP (ListManager SOLARIS/SPARC version 4.2); Sat, 12 Oct 2002 13:53:30 -0400
Received: (qmail 13834 invoked by uid 1006); 12 Oct 2002 17:50:56 -0000
Received: from BillRoss AT norisksoftware.com by realserver0 by uid 1003 with 
qmail-scanner-1.13 
 (uvscan: v4.1.40/v4228. spamassassin: 2.31.  Clear:. 
 Processed in 0.241606 secs); 12 Oct 2002 17:50:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO systemax01) (216.198.100.132)
  by -v with SMTP; 12 Oct 2002 17:50:56 -0000
Reply-To: <BillRoss AT norisksoftware.com>
From: "Bill Ross" <BillRoss AT norisksoftware.com>
To: "'Biblical Hebrew'" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Subject: RE: Gen 15:6 feminine suffix?
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 12:50:55 -0500
Organization: No Risk Software Inc
Message-ID: <002f01c27217$ea68b4a0$2801a8c0 AT norisksoftware.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: 
<LISTMANAGER-137645-88464-2002.10.10-19.48.08--wross#farmerstel.com AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>


<Bryan>
>>I would say the absence of noun to specify the clitic pronoun subject
of vayyaxshabeha serves to preserve *the believing* as the dominant
focal element in both clauses.

<Bill>
Is it *in the realm of possibility* that the absence of a noun to
specify "promise" could lead one to understand "promising" as the
dominant focal element? Ie: "it" refering to God's promising?

Bill Ross