b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Jack Kilmon" <jkilmon AT historian.net>
- To: "Ian Goldsmith" <iangoldsmith1969 AT yahoo.co.uk>, "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Iron and Bronze.
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 08:35:24 -0500
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian Goldsmith" <iangoldsmith1969 AT yahoo.co.uk>
To: "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 5:34 AM
Subject: Iron and Bronze.
> If I were to write a story about my ancestors I
> wouldn't put in their hands items that didn't exist in
> their day, it'd be pointless. So why is Tubal-cain
> mentioned as the first iron worker?
Because these works were written in the Iron Age (8th-7th CE). I don't
believe these writers knew the distinction between Bronze and Iron Ages.
These types of anachronisms are quite common, are they not?
Jack
-
RE: Iron and Bronze.,
Peter Kirk, 09/01/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Iron and Bronze., Polycarp66, 09/01/2002
-
Re: Iron and Bronze.,
Jack Kilmon, 09/04/2002
- Re: Iron and Bronze., Ian Goldsmith, 09/04/2002
- Re: Iron and Bronze., Polycarp66, 09/04/2002
- Re: Iron and Bronze., Ian Goldsmith, 09/04/2002
- Re: Iron and Bronze., Yigal Levin, 09/04/2002
- Re: Iron and Bronze., Ian Goldsmith, 09/04/2002
- Re: Iron and Bronze., Polycarp66, 09/04/2002
- Re: Iron and Bronze., Ian Charles Hutchesson, 09/04/2002
- Re: Iron and Bronze., RGmyrken, 09/05/2002
- RE: Iron and Bronze., Peter Kirk, 09/05/2002
- Re: Iron and Bronze., Yigal Levin, 09/06/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.