Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: b-hebrew digest: August 25, 2002

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Moshe Shulman <mshulman AT ix.netcom.com>
  • To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: b-hebrew digest: August 25, 2002
  • Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:41:17 -0400

At 12:32 PM 8/27/02 -0700, you wrote:
Subject: Re: The OT?
From: Gary D. Salyer <gds AT dor.kaiser.org>
Date: Tuesday, August 27
X-Message-Number: 1

It has been interesting to read the various takes and offences taken over the use of the terms OT/Tanach/HB.  Has anyone ever considered James Sanders' suggestion that we use the terms First Testament and Second Testament as a way to refer to the OT/NT?  He suggested this idea 15 years ago.  See: "First Testament/Second Testament", Biblical Theology Bulletin 37 (1988), pp. 47-49.

But those who believe in one and only one Testament have a problem with that, which is not much different then the wording of 'old' and 'new'. What would you think of someone who referred to the OT/NT as the true Bible and the false Bible?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moshe Shulman   outreach AT messiahtruth.com 718-436-7705
Messiah Truth/Judaism's Answer:  http://www.messiahtruth.com/
Outreach Judaism:   http://www.outreachjudaism.org/
CHASSIDUS.NET - Yoshav Rosh       http://www.chassidus.net
Chassidus discussion list:        chassidus-subscribe AT yahoogroups.com



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page