b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Moshe Shulman <mshulman AT ix.netcom.com>
- To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: b-hebrew digest: August 25, 2002
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:41:17 -0400
At 12:32 PM 8/27/02 -0700, you wrote:
Subject: Re: The OT?
From: Gary D. Salyer <gds AT dor.kaiser.org>
Date: Tuesday, August 27
X-Message-Number: 1
It has been interesting to read the various takes and offences taken over the use of the terms OT/Tanach/HB. Has anyone ever considered James Sanders' suggestion that we use the terms First Testament and Second Testament as a way to refer to the OT/NT? He suggested this idea 15 years ago. See: "First Testament/Second Testament", Biblical Theology Bulletin 37 (1988), pp. 47-49.
But those who believe in one and only one Testament have a problem with that, which is not much different then the wording of 'old' and 'new'. What would you think of someone who referred to the OT/NT as the true Bible and the false Bible?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moshe Shulman outreach AT messiahtruth.com
718-436-7705
Messiah Truth/Judaism's Answer:
http://www.messiahtruth.com/
Outreach Judaism:
http://www.outreachjudaism.org/
CHASSIDUS.NET - Yoshav Rosh
http://www.chassidus.net
Chassidus discussion list:
chassidus-subscribe AT yahoogroups.com
-
Re: b-hebrew digest: August 25, 2002,
gds, 08/27/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: b-hebrew digest: August 25, 2002, Jonathan D. Safren, 08/27/2002
- RE: b-hebrew digest: August 25, 2002, Bill Ross, 08/27/2002
- RE: b-hebrew digest: August 25, 2002, Lisbeth S. Fried, 08/27/2002
- Re: b-hebrew digest: August 25, 2002, Moshe Shulman, 08/30/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.