b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Jonathan D. Safren" <yonsaf AT beitberl.ac.il>
- To: "Lisbeth S. Fried" <lizfried AT umich.edu>, "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: nasa' et ha ro'$
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 19:03:28 +0200
Liz, I already pointed out that what is commonly
called "Biblical Hebrew" is actually a conglomerate of all the stages of the
language, synchronous and diachronous, during about 1,000 years (if you're not a
minimalist), from the Song of Deborah until the Books of Daniel, Esther,
Chronicles.
It's roughly comparable to placing Chaucer, Sir
Thomas Malory, Shalespeare, George Burns and rap songs all under the same
rubric.
Naturally a language used for 1,000 years in many
different and isolated places, by many users and for different
purposes undergoes changes, including changes in connotations of words and
expressions. Look at dara$ et YHWH in First Temple, and part of Second Temple
biblical lit. as compared to dara$ le-YHWH in Chronicles; examples are
legion.
In my first-year course in using professional
literature, I give my students a word or _expression_ and instruct them to trace,
using a concordance, the different connotations and explain how it came about -
First or Second Temple, poetic or prose, specialized uses, etc.
How often do we use the word "contumely" today? How
has the main connotation of the word "gay" changed in the last 30 years or so?
(Compare with MH gamar 30 years ago and now. I can't even use the word
any more without raising eyebrows).
Sincerely,
Jonathan
--------------
Jonathan D. Safren
Dept. of Biblical Studies Beit Berl College Beit Berl Post Office 44905 Israel "sha'alu shelom yerushalayim yishlayu kol
'ohavayikh"
|
-
nasa' et ha ro'$,
Lisbeth S. Fried, 05/20/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: nasa' et ha ro'$, Trevor Peterson, 05/20/2002
- Re: nasa' et ha ro'$, Jonathan D. Safren, 05/20/2002
- Re: nasa' et ha ro'$, Jonathan D. Safren, 05/20/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.