b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Henry Churchyard" <churchh AT crossmyt.com>
- To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: Hebrew New Testament
- Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 20:56:08 -0500 (CDT)
> From: "Henry Churchyard" <churchh AT crossmyt.com>
> Some scholars have argued that the fragments of Aramaic embedded in
> the Greek gospels indicate that there was a written Aramaic document
> of the sayings of Jesus which was drawn upon by the Gospel authors.
> Also, there was a Hebrew version of Matthew which was probably
> around in the early middle ages, and was definitely around in the
> late middle ages (but which is not the "original" version of the
> Matthew). And the literature of the early Jewish Christian group
> was presumably partly in Aramaic and Hebrew. But all evidence is
> that the New Testament as we have it today was not originally
> written in Aramaic or Hebrew.
Oops, sorry for the grammar errors (number agreement) in my original
posting (was composing quickly).
--
Henry Churchyard churchh AT crossmyt.com http://www.crossmyt.com/hc/
-
Hebrew New Testament,
Lamont Norman, 08/16/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Hebrew New Testament, Henry Churchyard, 08/19/2001
- Re: Hebrew New Testament, Henry Churchyard, 08/19/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.