b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Trevor & Julie Peterson" <speederson AT erols.com>
- To: "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: Pronunciation
- Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 06:53:32 -0400
While
it seems that there was a distinction at some point between the two, many follow
the Modern Hebrew pronunciation system and don't make a distinction between G.
and G, D. and D, T. and T, but do distinguish B. from B (/v/), K. from K
(similar to Heth), and P. from P (/f/). If you've been using the
Classical, academic pronunciation system, you would also need to change W from
/w/ to /v/, lengthen almost all instances of Hireq, pronounce all a-vowels the
same, and (without going into a lot of detail) treat a lot more Shewas as
silent. A number of Hebrew grammars would present this system in more
detail, including Bryan Rocine's new introductory grammar and the intermediate
grammar by van der Merwe, et al. Also, because it's based on Modern
Hebrew, I presume you could find some help from Modern Hebrew references (or
speakers, if any happen to be available to you).
In the
Classical system, which is outlined in Seow's introductory grammar, the simple
answer to your question is that one generally does not make a distinction
between the two. An alternative, found in Jouon, is an attempt at
reconstructing Masoretic pronunciation. Its advantage is that it tries to
distinguish the sounds of all the letters from one another to some
degree and would probably be a bit more helpful for learning vocabulary and
paradigms with correct spelling. It is also, at least in theory, a
pronunciation of the language that was living at one point (which is not
generally thought to be true of the Classical approach). One disadvantage
is that it's not living now, so you can't really interact with native speakers,
as you can with Modern Hebrew. It is also probably the most complicated
system to learn, because it draws upon a number of Semitic (chiefly Arabic)
sounds that have no close parallel in Western languages. In that system, G
would have a velarized pronunciation, somewhat analogously to K vs. K.
Spirantized D vs. hard D would be analogous to /th/ vs. /t/ (something like the
/th/ in English "then").
Trevor
Peterson
CUA/Semitics
|
-
Pronunciation,
Jonathan Bailey, 04/14/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Pronunciation, Dave Washburn, 04/14/2001
- RE: Pronunciation, Trevor & Julie Peterson, 04/15/2001
- Re: Pronunciation, Jonathan Bailey, 04/15/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.