Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: Out of Egypt

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Dave Washburn" <dwashbur AT nyx.net>
  • To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: Out of Egypt
  • Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 12:08:16 -0700

>We know a good deal more now about who (for example) >King Arthur was and was not than people who lived in the >Middle Ages did. Why shouldit be different with the Bible?

This is assumption #1.

>Historical research has come a long way - but it has to be >applied without preconceived dogmas, like any other >scientific exercise.

Assumption #2, and frankly, an impossibility.

>After all, the Exodus account was itself written several >hundred years after the date at which the eventsare >recounted as taking place.

Assumption #3. We don't know for sure one way or the other.

>The political and national motives for embellishment are >self-evident.

Assumption #4. This is only one way of reading it, and is built on several other assumptions.

>Historians noware a priori more likely than people writing >under the monarchy or in Babylonian exile to be able to >look at the evidence dispassionately.

Assumption #5. Not only is this statement riddled with unwarranted pride in ourselves, the whole idea of lookin at history "dispassionately" is essence of garden fertilizer.

>But when we desperately WANT the "evidence" to >corroboratesomething close to our hearts, we cloud our >scientific objectivity.

Assumption #6 and #7. Anybody who disagrees must want something; there is such a thing as "scientific objectivity."

>This isa critical, scientific List.

Assumption #8. This list is about biblical Hebrew and all the various ways of coming at it. Trying to narrow its scope in this way is not only artificial, it excludes certain approaches a priori, which is not scientific.

Dave Washburn
http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur
"No study of probabilities inside a given frame can ever
tell us how probable it is that the frame itself can be
violated."  C. S. Lewis








Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.