Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: A 'Thrashing' Floor?

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Dave Washburn" <dwashbur AT nyx.net>
  • To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: A 'Thrashing' Floor?
  • Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 07:56:20 -0700


I'm only going to respond to part of this post:

> For other examples of theological history revised from different
> perspectives,
> look at the 'doublets', such as the wife/sister stories in Genesis 12, 20
> and
> 26, and Exodus17/Numbers 20 versions of water from the rock. Genesis
> 1:1-2:4a
> and 2:4bf, roughly-speaking show the update (1:1-2:4a) of a previous
> tradition
> (2:4bf) judged by the relative sophistication and abstraction of the first
> over
> the second, with its recognisably priestly concern with sacred numbers
> inside a
> universal conception of God as Creator of the whole world (cf. Isaiah 40)
> which
> to me indicates the Exile, Return and after, because the universal
> world-view
> is compatible with the syncretistic approach of the Persians whose victory
> over
> Babylon set Jews (who chose to be so) free to return to re-establish
> Jerusalem.

The sheer volume of assumption in the above paragraph is
staggering. It assumes that people (assuming the historicity of the
patriarchs, which I do) would never make the same mistake more
than once, and that a succeeding generation would never repeat a
previous one's mistake; it assumes an evolutionary model of
religious ideas which has never been proven, merely assumed in
such studies; in addition, it assumes that we have the capability in
our exalted modernity to figure out how that evolutionary model
worked; it assumes that the biblical writers couldn't possibly do
something as simple as giving readers two different views of the
same creation, just from different angles; in short, it assumes that
we have everything we need to get inside the minds of the writers
and the characters behind the stories, and that we know more

about Hebrew literature than the Hebrews did. It all makes a pretty
picture, but it's a hopelessly artificial picture that may or may not
have any basis in objective reality.

Dave Washburn
http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur
"No study of probabilities inside a given frame can ever
tell us how probable it is that the frame itself can be
violated." C. S. Lewis




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page