b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Moshe Shulman <mshulman AT ix.netcom.com>
- To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: btwlh & `lmh
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:29:51 -0500
At 10:46 AM 1/30/01 +1100, George Athas wrote:
| That is good Ian, because there is none. Almah is the n.f. of elem. This
| list seems to be degenerating into theology.
I beg to differ, Moshe. We are discussing the semantic range of a Hebrew word. I think I
can summarise the general gist of what people are saying:
(1) `Almah means "young girl"
(2) The word makes no specific reference to physical virginity
(3) According to social custom of the ancient Near East, an `almah can be expected to be a
physical virgin by virtue of the young girl's age. But since the word does not refer to
virginity, this is only a possible corollary statement.
1 and 2 are true. Three is not. Marriage at very young ages was the norm until recently.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
moshe shulman mshulman AT NOSPAMix.netcom.com 718-436-7705
CHASSIDUS.NET - Yoshav Rosh http://www.chassidus.net
Chassidus shiur: chassidus-subscribe AT chassidus.net
Chassidus discussion list: chassidus-subscribe AT egroups.com
Outreach Judaism http://www.outreachjudaism.org/
ICQ# 52009254 Yahoo/MSN Messaging: mosheshulman
-
btwlh & `lmh,
Ian Hutchesson, 01/29/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: btwlh & `lmh, Moshe Shulman, 01/29/2001
- Re: btwlh & `lmh, Charles David Isbell, 01/29/2001
- Re: btwlh & `lmh, George Athas, 01/29/2001
- RE: btwlh & `lmh, Liz Fried, 01/29/2001
- Re: btwlh & `lmh, Moshe Shulman, 01/29/2001
- Re: btwlh & `lmh, Jonathan D. safren, 01/30/2001
- Re: btwlh & `lmh, Lewis Reich, 01/30/2001
- btwlh & `lmh, Harold R. Holmyard III, 01/30/2001
- RE: btwlh & `lmh, Peter Kirk, 01/30/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.