b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Re: Is hakhal the correspondent substantive to ekklesia in LXX

From: ben.crick AT argonet.co.uk (Ben Crick)
To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
Subject: Re: Is hakhal the correspondent substantive to ekklesia in LXX
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 23:41:25 +0100

On Sat 22 Jul 2000 (14:08:02), daladier AT elogica.com.br wrote:
> Is qahal the correspondent substantive to ekklesia in LXX?

Yes, generally: see Acts 7:38 ... EH THi EKKLHSIAi EN THi ERHMWi, KTL.

Compare Deuteronomy 18:16, BaYYoWM HaQQaHaL ....

Shalom
Ben
--
Revd Ben Crick, BA CF
<ben.crick AT argonet.co.uk>
232 Canterbury Road, Birchington, Kent, CT7 9TD (UK)
http://www.cnetwork.co.uk/crick.htm

Is hakhal the correspondent substantive to ekklesia in LXX, Daladier Lima, 07/22/2000
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Is hakhal the correspondent substantive to ekklesia in LXX, Ben Crick, 07/22/2000