Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: Is hakhal the correspondent substantive to ekklesia in LXX

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: ben.crick AT argonet.co.uk (Ben Crick)
  • To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
  • Subject: Re: Is hakhal the correspondent substantive to ekklesia in LXX
  • Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 23:41:25 +0100


On Sat 22 Jul 2000 (14:08:02), daladier AT elogica.com.br wrote:
> Is qahal the correspondent substantive to ekklesia in LXX?

Yes, generally: see Acts 7:38 ... EH THi EKKLHSIAi EN THi ERHMWi, KTL.

Compare Deuteronomy 18:16, BaYYoWM HaQQaHaL ....

Shalom
Ben
--
Revd Ben Crick, BA CF
<ben.crick AT argonet.co.uk>
232 Canterbury Road, Birchington, Kent, CT7 9TD (UK)
http://www.cnetwork.co.uk/crick.htm







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page