Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: Genesis 1:1: independent clause or subordinate phrase?

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Alviero Niccacci <sbfnet AT netvision.net.il>
  • To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Cc: peter_kirk AT sil.org
  • Subject: Re: Genesis 1:1: independent clause or subordinate phrase?
  • Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 10:44:26 +0200

Title: Re: Genesis 1:1: independent clause or subordinate phr
On  06/12/99 (Genesis 1:1: independent clause or subordinate phrase?) Peter Kirk wrote:


Dear Prof. Niccacci,

        < snip >
Are there other instances of
time phrases beginning with B-<time word> which are separated from the
main clause to which they refer by waw? This structure would seem very
odd, as the waw is usually a clause divider but in such a case it
would not be, or else the time phrase would be left on its own with no
sentence to be linked to. < ...>
There are no other cases of the structure B-<time phrase> W-<main clause>.

        Some relevant examples and authorities were only quoted in order to show the legitimacy of the construct <nomen regens> + <finite verb as nomen rectum>.
        As for the structure B (or any preposition)-<time phrase> W-<main clauses> note the following examples:
- bi$nat mot hammelek `uzziyyahu   -- wa'er'eh 'et-'adonay (Isa 6:1)
- bi$nat mot hammelek 'aHaz        -- hayâ hammaSSa' hazzeh (Isa 14:28)

A comparison of the two examples shows that the Waw is optional; wayyiqtol and first-place qatal play the same function in this kind of construct having a circumstance of time (or the like) before the main clause. In traditional terminology, that Waw is called Waw apodoseos (Waw of apodosis)--actually the <time phrase> (or circumstance of time) functions as the protasis and the <main clause> functions as the apodosis of a conditional clause.


        < snip>
PK: To put this another way, the examples you quote are all consistent
with an analysis of Genesis 1:1 including a null complementiser (e.g.
perhaps a missing 'ASHER) as follows:

{time phrase {preposition B-}
             {noun phrase {construct noun RE'SHIT}
                          {noun phrase {complementiser 0}
                                       {sentence {verb BARA'}
                                                 {...}}}}}

where {...} is 'ELOHIM 'ET-HASHSHAMAYIM WE'ET HA'ARETS. On this
analysis, the whole verse is a time phrase, and so there should be no
waw separating it from the following clause. Also the embedded
sentence is QATAL first, not X-QATAL, for BERE'SHIT is not part of it.

        The following examples may answer your problem:
- beyôm bero' 'elohîm 'adam         -- bidmût 'elohîm `aSâ 'otô (Gen 5:1)
- bayyom ha$$eli$i                  -- wayyiSSa'  'abraham 'et-`enayw (Gen 22:4)
- `ereb                             -- wîda`tem ...
   ûboqer                           -- ûre'îtem ... (Exod 16:6-7)
- beyôm qwnôteka haSSadeh ...       -- ûme'et rût hammô'abiyyâ ... qanîta (qere) ... (Ruth 4:5)

        The construct <time phrase> - <main clause> is also attested with a preceding wayehî:

-wayehî le$ib`at hayyamîm           -- ûmê hammabbûl hayû `al-ha'aretz (Gen 7:10)
- wayehii 'aHar haddebarîm ha'elleh -- weha'elohîm nissa' 'et-'abraham (Gen 22:1)
- wayehî babboqer                   -- wayyiqqaH balaq 'et-bil`am (Num22:41)

        < snip >

I wonder if you can comment on whether in general pairs of X-QATAL
clauses joined by waw should be taken as simultaneous, sequential or
what?  < ... >

        Pairs of X-QATAL (i.e. X-QATAL both in the protasis and in the apodosis) are attested. As far as I know, they signal simultaneity but I did not make a complete search. See the following examples:
- habboqer 'ôr                      -- weha'ana$îm $ulleHû ...
  hem yaTSe'û 'et-ha`îr, lo' hirHîqû-- weyôsep 'amar ... (Gen 44:3-4)
- habboqer hayâ                     -- werûaH haqqadîm naSa' 'et-ha'arbeh (Exod 10:13).

        If you are interested in a more or less complete typology of the very interesting and rich construct <time phrase> - <main clause> you may consult my _Syntax_ Chap. 8, which is completely devoted to its typology and evaluation.

Peace and all good.
Alviero Niccacci

Studium Biblicum Franciscanum      Tel. +972 - 2 - 6282 936
POB 19424 - 91193 - Jerusalem      Fax  +972 - 2 - 6264 519
Israel
Home Page:     http://198.62.75.1/www1/ofm/sbf/SBFmain.html
Email  mailto:sbfnet AT netvision.net.il



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page