b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: yochanan bitan <ButhFam AT compuserve.com>
- To: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Copy of: re: Gen 26:13
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 04:15:22 -0400
seems i forgot to forward to b-hebrew :-)
randall buth
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
From: yochanan bitan, ButhFam AT compuserve.com
TO: "Dave Washburn", INTERNET:dwashbur AT nyx.net
DATE: 29/09/99 02:16
RE: Copy of: re: Gen 26:13
>In Gen 26:13 we seem to have a rogue weqatal, W:GFD"L. The
>two preceding clauses are both wayyiqtol, the following one
>(subordinated with a preposition) is qatal. I can't see any reason
>why a weqatal would be between these.
actually, gadel is probably not a rogue veqatal, but ve+participle.
"halox ve+inf absolute" is a regular idiom for "more and more ..." that
also parallels "particple + holex" (cf. yonah 1.12) for the same "more and
more" idea. It appears that the author has mixed these two idioms here:
halox [infinitive absolute] plus the participle from the "participle +
holex" idiom.
if you want, you can even call gadel a dialectical by-form for the
infinitive absolute
(see david qimHi, 12th century).
[for an ancient contrary view, ibn ezra takes this as veqatal, apparently
content with the open-endedness of the past habitual "was getting bigger"
(i.e. aspectually the same as yiqtol)].
myself, i read as participle, recognizing that a dialectical inf. absolute
would mean the same thing anyway.
braxot
randall buth
- Copy of: re: Gen 26:13, yochanan bitan, 10/01/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.