b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: John Ronning <ronning AT nis.za>
- To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: na`arah
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 21:49:06 +0200
George, you wrote:
>
> Widows who had no children had their status changed from "wife" to
> "virgin/maiden" (_na`arah_) because they returned to their paternal
> household (_beyt-'ab_) and
> could be married off again. Being a "virgin" in ancient Palestine was not
> so much about physical
> status as marital status. Ruth is an exceptional case in that she choses
> not to return to her
> paternal household - ie, she goes completely against the logical norm of
> the day.
>
But a widow could also be described as the "woman" i.e. wife
of her dead husband
>
> The root N(R does still imply "inexperience". That is why it is used in a
> range of situations
> with meanings such as "apprentice", "junior", "acolyte", "lad", "girl",
> etc. Eg, at 40 years old,
> Rehoboam was a _na`ar_. The word commonly translated as "maiden" or
> "virgin" has its etymology in
> this understanding.
Can't we also include "youth"? E.g. the little girl
(na`arah qetannah) captured by the Arameans (2
Kings 5:2) - I think it's her youth, not sexual experience
or marital status or eligibility that's
the point. We shouldn't be trying to prove anything by
etymology anyway.
Na`arah may usually be used of a single girl, but it doesn't
"mean" single girl, as is clear from the fact that it is
used of the Levite's concubine (Judges 19),
Regards,
John
-
na`arah,
George Athas, 09/28/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: na`arah, Joseph Crea, 09/29/1999
- Re: na`arah, George Athas, 09/29/1999
- Re: na`arah, John Ronning, 09/29/1999
- Re: na`arah, George Athas, 09/30/1999
- Re: na`arah, John Ronning, 09/30/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.