b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Dave Washburn" <dwashbur AT nyx.net>
- To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: Would you agree with this statement?
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 13:39:47 -0700
While rereading F. I. Andersen, "The Sentence in Biblical Hebrew,"
I came across the following statement:
qum <A> qax 'et-'ishteka, Get up: take your wife! (Ge 19:15)
[Note that I have adapted some of his notation, and the <A>
indicates apposition.]
Of this passage he says
"The first verb becomes semantically empty, functioning merely as
a hortatory particle." (p.56)
I'm interested in what the rest of you think of this statement. I
wonder, based in part on Jonah 1:1ff where YHWH tells Jonah to
"get up, go to Nineveh" whereas Jonah "got up and ran away." It
seems to me that QUM there serves a definite rhetorical function
producing a certain irony. However, the Genesis passage
Andersen mentions may be different. Opinions?
Dave Washburn
http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur
"Oh, no! They've all become giant Swiss lederhosen-clad
dancing yodelers!" "Talk about unpredictable!" - P&B
- Would you agree with this statement?, Dave Washburn, 08/23/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.