b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Ken Litwak <kdlitwak AT concentric.net>
- To: Lloyd Barre <barre AT c-zone.net>
- Cc: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Some comments and questions
- Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1999 17:46:22 -0800
Lloyd, without quoting, and knowing this is not precisely on bibical
Hebrew, may I suggest that "direct dependence" is not the best way to
understand how the biblical text relates to EE? There are two issues
here. First, proving dependence is tough. Similarity doesn't probve
dependence,. Second, the two works are SO different theologically, that
I think is it plain that Genesis is written as a polemical anti-myuth
attack on the views of Israel's neighbors. OTherwise, if i8t merely
depeneded upon EE, it would be polytheistic, have gods with little or no
moral standards, and not creation ex nihilo.
Ken Litwak
University of Bristol
Bristol, England
(and Java instructor in California)
-
Some comments and questions,
Lloyd Barre, 01/03/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Some comments and questions, Ken Litwak, 01/03/1999
- Re: Some comments and questions, Lee R. Martin, 01/04/1999
- Re: Some comments and questions, Stephen Knapp, 01/07/1999
- Re: Some comments and questions, Ian Hutchesson, 01/07/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.