[XOM-interest] Re: Unicode forms for internal storage

Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo at metalab.unc.edu
Wed Jan 21 07:02:14 EST 2004

At 10:24 AM +0000 1/21/04, Jon Hanna wrote:

>Do you plan to support XML1.1 with XOM? The C0 controls forbidden in the 1.0
>spec are allowed in the 1.1 spec if they appear as character references - so
>this no longer holds (unless you store them as references or 
>otherwise escaped,
>which would bring its own issues).

No, I don't plan to support XML 1.1, certainly not in XOM 1.0 and 
beyond that not unless someone asks for it and demonstrates a real 
need. This is discussed in the XOM FAQ at 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   elharo at metalab.unc.edu
   Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)

More information about the XOM-interest mailing list