[XOM-interest] Obscure encodings
cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Fri Jan 2 14:12:05 EST 2004
Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:
> It turns out there is one difference between TIS-620 and ISO-8859-11,
> though nothing that can't be worked around. 8859-11 defines 0xA0 as
> the non-breaking space. TIS-620 does not, leaving this code point
It's an invariant of all 8859-x standards that NBSP is at A0.
> Also interesting, 8859-11 is the only ISO set I've seen that does not
> define 80-9F as the C1 controls. It leaves them undefined, probably
> for compatibility with TIS-620.
A distinction without a difference. The actual 8859-1 standards
document (http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/ISO-IR/100.pdf) doesn't
define them either.
John Cowan www.ccil.org/~cowan www.reutershealth.com jcowan at reutershealth.com
All "isms" should be "wasms". --Abbie
More information about the XOM-interest