[TypicalGirls] chronological cutoff

Dina Hornreich dina.hornreich at gmail.com
Mon Jun 4 19:53:31 EDT 2007


The 2 UT reissues that I have are dated past 1984 (for their original 
release dates). That clears up my perplexitites thoough.

We've got Lydia Lunch on the list under the reissue fo the No New York 
compilation. (Too bad the Wanna Buy a Bridge reissue fell through...)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hilary Jaeger" <jaema11 at earthlink.net>
To: "Typical Girls: Women in Punk/Post-Punk/Underground Music (Circa 
1975-1980s)" <typicalgirls at lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: [TypicalGirls] chronological cutoff


> Hey All; and, Dina;
> Do you mean that Ut can't be on the list because it's post-1985?
> Ut played Tier 3 half a dozen times in 1980.  FYI, so did many of the 
> bands
> on the list: The Raincoats, The Slits, ESG, X, Bush Tetras, Y Pants, Delta
> 5, Young Marble Giants, and, for that matter, Malaria and The Dance. (Just
> tooting the old horn..)
> Lydia Lunch also performed there in 8 Eyed Spy and Devil Dogs--she's GOT 
> to
> be on the list, but in which incarnation, I'm not sure---obviously there
> have to be recordings--and I'm not sure there were with Devil Dogs, or
> Beirut Slump etc.  So what up--Teenage Jesus, 8 Eyed Spy?
>
> Hilary
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dina Hornreich" <dina.hornreich at gmail.com>
> To: "Typical Girls: Women in Punk/Post-Punk/Underground Music (Circa
> 1975-1980s)" <typicalgirls at lists.ibiblio.org>
> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 5:59 PM
> Subject: [TypicalGirls] chronological cutoff
>
>
>> I believe the same holds true for UT, sadly!
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "dan bailey" <dpbailey at att.net>
>> To: "Typical Girls: Women in Punk/Post-Punk/Underground Music (Circa
>> 1975-1980s)" <typicalgirls at lists.ibiblio.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 11:25 AM
>> Subject: Re: [TypicalGirls] SUBMIT BLURBS PLEASE! We're up to 22
> must-haves!
>>
>>
>> > >Or is there a chronological cutoff (around 1985, to judge by the list
> we
>> >>already have)? If there's a 1985-86 cutoff, Salem 66 and/or Scrawl
> should
>> >>just sneak in... do either of them belong?<
>> >
>> > Quoting Dina --
>> >
>> >>>I narrowed our list down to 1975-1984 because that was the general 
>> >>>time
>> > period I intended when I created the listserv. I've been waffling on
> that
>> > decision, but (in the end) I'm going to stand by it.<<
>>> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> TypicalGirls mailing list
> TypicalGirls at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/typicalgirls 




More information about the TypicalGirls mailing list