[SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells

Juuso Alasuutari iuso at sourcemage.org
Fri Oct 6 06:19:04 EDT 2006

We were discussing this subject with ruskie, and I thought I should ask about 
it here: How many prefer having the cvs/devel version of a program integrated 
into the mainline spell, and how many think it's generally best to have 
separate spells?

I'm for the latter option, it imho makes maintenance much easier both for the 
spell in question and for situations where other spells depend on features 
that are only found or missing in the cvs version. That's how we handle 
versioned dependencies otherwise anyway.

I'm sure ruskie wants to present his point of view here, and others probably 
as well. I'd also like to see links to previous discussions, if someone has 

        Juuso Alasuutari
[[ Source Mage GNU/Linux ]]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/attachments/20061006/27646eee/attachment.bin 

More information about the SM-Discuss mailing list