[percy-l] A Walker Percy piece written for the NY Times 30 years ago
janetcantor37 at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 8 15:26:58 EST 2011
I think the point of the Percy Lists is to discuss Percy, not argue the Scopes
Percy had a point of view based on his experience and observations. My reason
for giving such a long response is to try stick to analyzing Percy's idea.
Often an author has ideas or characters that are unappealing to me, but in a
book discussion, it is not my place to judge him, but to analyze him and what he
is trying to say. I may dislike Iago, but Shakespeare still wants me to find him
interesting and to try to find reasons to identify with him.
From: Charles Lowry <lowry.charles at gmail.com>
To: Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion <percy-l at lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Tue, February 8, 2011 11:43:03 AM
Subject: Re: [percy-l] A Walker Percy piece written for the NY Times 30 years
Wade has, perhaps inadvertently, drawn into focus what is the heart of the
matter: "Disliking, even denouncing, abortion may be appealing for Christians,
but drawing on the law to prohibit it during an ambiguous period of human
development is impractical." The point that many pro-life advocates argue, and
it is a point that has noticeable impact on the ideological equilibrium of
pro-choice advocates, is that every scientific advance in embryology takes us
further and further from regarding life in the womb as "an ambiguous period of
human development." I wonder if the increasing queasiness of larger and larger
numbers of Americans about the moral and legal status of abortion is connected
not to false science, but to the advance of science and the more precise
knowledge we have of the stages of fetal development.
There is near universal revulsion over the practices of the Philadelphia doctor
who concluded many of his "abortions" by using scissors to sever the spinal cord
of living infants. But is it just a matter of timing? What we are also
finding, I submit, is that more and more of our neighbors slogging their way
through what the ancient hymn calls this vale of tears are reluctant to engage
what we may refer to as the backwards clock, to come to the conclusion at a
definite point, "yes, not human today, okay to fix the 'problem,' but probably
human tomorrow." It is ironic for both sides in this debate that the advance of
science has not liberated us, but has offered us knowledge of the stages of
human fetal development that, on the contrary, constrict us.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Percy-L