[nafex] wrong person but maybe right answer

Anton Callaway marillen at earthlink.net
Tue Jul 9 17:59:43 EDT 2013


Some pears are truly self-fertile and produce fertile, seeded fruit (not parthenocarpic).  Some examples are Kieffer and Spalding.  Most pears are not self-fertile.  They have an S-ribonuclease system that enforces self-incompatibility and outcrossing.  However, you raise a good question about the gray area.  There is likely a subset of pears that produce a very small number of fertile seed without pollenization from  another cultivar.  I don't know of an example, but it would be interesting to look for one.  


-----Original Message-----
>From: Alan Haigh <alandhaigh at gmail.com>
>Sent: Jul 7, 2013 12:13 PM
>To: nafex at lists.ibiblio.org
>Subject: [nafex] wrong person but maybe right answer
>Anton, You know I meant parthenocarpic- the funny thing is I was copying
>the word directly from a botany book as I always forget the word in the
>long intervals between usage.  Dyslexic moment, I guess.  Should have
>studied Latin.
>Anyway, your point can easily be checked by the existence or non-existence
>of seeds, I assume.   Then the question could become, "are some pears self
>fertile?".  Is there a definitive answer to this question?  Childs seems to
>suggest by inference that no pears are self fertile and self fruiting pears
>would never have seeds.
>"Parthenocarpy will explain some cropping in some situations on some
>species, but unless the female is kept in an isolation cage, true
>pollination can occur over longer-than-expected distances at some frequency
>as well."
>nafex mailing list 
>nafex at lists.ibiblio.org
>aubscribe/unsubscribe|user config|list info|make a donation toward list maintenance:
>message archives
>Google message archive search:
>site: lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/nafex [searchstring] 
>nafex list mirror sites:
>Avant Geared  http://www.avantgeared.com

More information about the nafex mailing list