[NAFEX] realism when looking at inputs

Kevin Moore aleguy33 at yahoo.com
Thu Jun 18 18:08:32 EDT 2009


Actually the mass transit system of San Francisco comes very close. BART (the subway) electric buses and light rail all run most of the city's mass transit. They still had a few ICE buses the last time I was there, but it's a lot better than the transit in most places. Technically San Francisco owns all the water and power from the Hetch Hetchy dam in Yosemite National Park. If the reality matched the legal fiction, then all their electric mass transit would in fact be run by renewable energy.




________________________________
From: "abb7 at Lehigh.EDU" <abb7 at Lehigh.EDU>
To: nafex at lists.ibiblio.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 9:59:41 PM
Subject: Re: [NAFEX] realism when looking at inputs

> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Kevin Moore <aleguy33 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [NAFEX] realism when looking at inputs

> Sorry, fluffy, I can't let this one slide. Mass transit is better  
> for the >environment when done right. Meaning electric trains and  
> buses fueled by >renewable energy.

That would be an excellent system...does it exist anywhere?  Certainly  
the huge majority, if not all, mass transit systems have not been  
"done right" by your criteria.  I hope Fluffy corrects me if I'm  
wrong, but I think you're illustrating his point...the theoretical  
ideal model does not really match reality.  Certainly he was  
criticizing existing mass transport systems.

> Try permaculture. A method of farming/gardening that is more  
> productive and >uses >few to no outside inputs. a method that is  
> nearly always more wholesome >than >what organic has become under  
> the auspices of the USDA. Its early emphasis >was >on tree crops but  
> now encompasses also grain and aquaculture. (Not to >mention >city  
> design, banking, etc.) The same principles apply to all these, and  
> >yes it >is truly sustainable.

Although there is a lot of overlap, I find the permaculture approach  
much more sensible than the "organic" approach.

Alex

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

_______________________________________________
nafex mailing list 
nafex at lists.ibiblio.org

Reproduction of list messages or archives is not allowed.
This includes distribution on other email lists or reproduction on web sites.
Permission to reproduce is NEVER granted, so don't claim you have permission!

**YOU MUST BE SUBSCRIBED TO POST!**
Posts from email addresses that are not subscribed are discarded.
No exceptions.  
----
To subscribe or unsubscribe, go to the bottom of this page (also can be used to change other email options):
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/nafex

File attachments are NOT stripped by this list.
TAKE STEPS TO PROTECT YOURSELF FROM COMPUTER VIRUSES!
Please do not send binary files.
Use plain text ONLY in emails!

NAFEX web site:  http://www.nafex.org/



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/private/nafex/attachments/20090618/214447ce/attachment.html 


More information about the nafex mailing list