[NAFEX] My problem with global warming discussion
William C. Garthright
billg at inebraska.com
Sat Jun 6 09:54:25 EDT 2009
> If this were a debate between climatologists, meteorologists and
> others in related fields it might be interesting to me but this all
> seems like a rehashing of arguments I've heard before- in fact right here-
I agree completely. What's the point, except to - possibly - harm a
great fruit-growing list? I'm a layman, so I can't judge the scientific
validity of these arguments, anyway. I must simply expect that the
majority of climatologists know a LOT more about it than I do. They
might indeed be wrong, but they're much more likely to be correct in
their areas of specialty than my gut feelings.
We all have opinions, and I certainly don't mind people stating a
position. To some extent, I do, myself, in my random "fortune cookie"
signatures. BUT I don't see any value at all in debating off-topic
subjects here. It might cause a great deal of harm, and I can't imagine
that it would do any good.
Lincoln, NE (zone 5)
They are in you and me; they created us, body and mind; and their
preservation is the ultimate rational for our existence. They have come
a long way, those replicators. Now they go by the name of genes, and we
are their survival machines. - Richard Dawkins
More information about the nafex