[NAFEX] California’s tree crops are screwed, says new report

Stephen Sadler Docshiva at Docshiva.org
Fri Jul 24 20:17:06 EDT 2009

No opinion or debate follows:


 I’ve read the original research – much more comprehensive than the press release/report; and am in correspondence with the authors.  One might want to read the paper and then specify methodological deficiencies.  

It happens constantly, especially in science, that research is simplified to the point where misunderstanding or rationalization is possible.  I don’t know what a good answer would be.  Not everyone can comfortably read original papers.  Perhaps trust the abstracts, or read detailed summaries is science-for-the-public journals like Discovery?  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/private/nafex/attachments/20090724/ec71464b/attachment.html 

More information about the nafex mailing list