[NAFEX] Yahoo groups listservs
Regina M. Kreger
regina at kreger.net
Mon Feb 18 07:18:15 EST 2008
I like Yahoo groups. I can choose to receive all messages by e-mail,
individually or in digest mode -- like this list -- or no e-mail at all
for the really busy lists so I can just log in to the list and read what
I want. It's basically a bulletin board AND an e-mail list, user's
choice. The digests come (optionally) in an enhanced e-mail format that
lets me click on the subject heading at the top of the digest and jump
to the message of interest. I believe it is possible to set it up such
that all comers can read all messages, but only administrator-approved
members can post (which could be = paying NAFEX members).
For those with slow internet connections, it is a good thing to be able
to go online, receive mail, go offline and read, rather than having to
be online the whole time one is reading.
Robert Mullins wrote:
> <div class="moz-text-flowed" style="font-family: -moz-fixed">Well, to
> be fair the question was 'how to get more people involved' and 'how to
> get a better presence' for the group. Bulletin boards is how you do
> it. If your goal is to simply stay the same and watch your membership
> dwindle then definitely you should stay with the way things are. The
> board members see the dwindling membership and want to do something
> about it, and rightly so. In addition, I do not have a vested
> interest except I am very interested in seeing the past preserved,
> especially with regard to antique apples and the like. It is much
> easier to secure and back up a highly structured and organized
> database as what is used in a bulletin board format than in a 'mailing
> list'. Backing up a mailing list simply saves all the information in
> a big, fat file, however backing up a database is structured, so that
> the data 'makes sense' and can easily be un-packed and re-used.
> 'Rooting' was absolutely accurate when he described email listings
> being 'antique', but it would be more descriptive to say it's
> 'archaic' from a technological perspective. I have wide interests,
> and read across the board in many disciplines and I simply don't know
> anyone still using mailing lists as a repository of information. You
> said " I want to see a better argument against the email list than
> that somebody thinks it is "antique"." Well, with technology this is
> a very real, and good argument. Just as a good reason why NOT to buy
> a Model 'T' Ford would be that you just can't find parts to them. I'm
> not saying that it wouldn't be cool to have one, but it's
> functionality is greatly diminished if not pretty much useless. If
> you want to have a 'Model T' out of fascination that is 'OK' but from
> what I get out of the past comments about mailing lists 'fascination'
> is not something you want in your information dispersion methodology.
> In addition, I am not one of those 'kids' who needs the shiny, and new
> to be interested, but as a new subscriber to NAFEX how will I get to
> something you posted here 5 years ago? With bulletin boards I could
> search that out even though I was a new subscriber.
> My perception is that NAFEX wants to be electronically viable as well
> as increase in membership. In order to do that the Pomona magazine
> needs an overhaul as well as the way information is dispensed.
> Information availability is very important in this information
> overkilled world, and I personally don't know anyone who wants to pour
> through around 100 emails a day just to get to information they are
> interested in. I myself considered turning off the email flood I get
> from NAFEX because it's just way too much.
> Road's End Farm wrote:
>> Oh I read it. I want to see a better argument against the email list
>> than that somebody thinks it is "antique". (I'm not saying there are
>> no better arguments; I just haven't seen any yet that convinced me.
>> Opinions will vary, I'm sure.)
>> Of course, you're posting this to a group in which the word "antique"
>> (as in "antique apple") is most often a compliment.
>> On Feb 17, 2008, at 8:12 PM, Robert Mullins wrote:
>>> Amen brother, hopefully 'Roads End' is reading this as well.
>>> rooting wrote:
>>>> Having read several comments about the listserver which NAFEX
>>>> uses, the current technology used by NAFEX is antique. The
>>>> most groups do not use e-mail for delivery. Rather they have a current
>>>> flow of information by topic using a board typically used by blogs.
>>>> Off topic, I have contributed to and frequently visit the mandolincafe
>>>> Mandolincafe is a specialty 'group' of people interested in playing
>>>> the mandolin. Soon they will have their 500,000th posting.
>>>> I suggest that the NAFEX webmaster(s) take a look at Mandolincafe
>>>> which uses a free program from
>>>> This program can be used on the http://nafex.org
>>>> <http://nafex.org/> server
>> nafex mailing list nafex at lists.ibiblio.org
>> Reproduction of list messages or archives is not allowed.
>> This includes distribution on other email lists or reproduction on
>> web sites.
>> Permission to reproduce is NEVER granted, so don't claim you have
>> **YOU MUST BE SUBSCRIBED TO POST!**
>> Posts from email addresses that are not subscribed are discarded.
>> No exceptions. ----
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe, go to the bottom of this page (also can
>> be used to change other email options):
>> File attachments are NOT stripped by this list.
>> TAKE STEPS TO PROTECT YOURSELF FROM COMPUTER VIRUSES!
>> Please do not send binary files.
>> Use plain text ONLY in emails!
>> NAFEX web site: http://www.nafex.org/
More information about the nafex