[NAFEX] electronic and membership discussion
dwoodard at becon.org
Sat Feb 16 13:29:26 EST 2008
I'm sorry that my perhaps too carelessly selected words should have been
misunderstood. What I was trying to get across is that as I see it NAFEX
is a relationship - between (oversimplified) repositories and suppliers
of knowledge, and those who use and supply the knowledge (and acquire
it, deepen it over the years and eventually become repositories and
suppliers themselves, some of them). The two sides are both indispensable.
However, the possessors of the deep knowledge are harder to come by,
there are fewer of them, and their time of greatest value occurs toward
the end of their lives, so doesn't last long. And, their specialty is
the knowledge, not the ability to transmit it. So the rest of us have to
be careful to not let the IT (and the writing) get in the way of the
knowledge, and its transmission, and working with plants.
Of course, to speak of two sides is an oversimplification, since there
is a continuum here. Two functions would be better.
I joined in 1976 and have seen people like Fred Ashworth, Milo Gibson,
Fred Janson, Robert Erskine, Percy Wright, and others flourish,
contribute...and die. I have a strong feeling that we have to make the
most of them while they are with us, and grow their replacements.
St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
L. Watson wrote:
> It's distressing to see people who love plants *and* technology scorned.
> I'd also hope for a more welcoming term for new members who want to
> learn from the core members than "parasites." I hope in a few years to
> have enough experience to add to the discussion.
More information about the nafex