[nafex] Re: A note of consern about this forum
lostman_amiga at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 28 13:55:14 EST 2002
Well, I have often found the archived information on here to be very
useful. I usually do word searches of a fruit on here. There is alot
of chatting that come up, but the chat/info ratio is quite good on
here. Maybe I am valuing this froum a bit to much as a information
resource, but I guess I am like that. I seem to collect everyrthing
else at home :) I think maybe be the fact that I am still new at this
fruit growing, and I hunger for all kinds of information on the
subject. Until I get a good library togather, I will value this forum
......maybe more than I should.
--- In nafex at y..., "Vintage Virginia Apples LLC" <fruit at v...> wrote:
> I think the points Mr. Miller raises speak to the heart of this
> chat line and the NAFEX website serve different if related
> Moreover, does anyone believe that a complete archive of the chat
> serve any real purpose? It facilitates communications among
> people with often related interests and occasionally useful
> information relative to growing fruit and this exchange serves a
> purpose in itself, but toextract the useful from the plethora of
> would require considerable editing and indexing in my opinion and
> be better served to pursue the enhancement of the NAFEX website by
> endeavors. Perhaps some of us interested in this could summarize
> the more useful discussions and submit that to Pomona, which could
> archived, and in any event, every member would have a copy to
> not as they wished.
> The Board of NAFEX has discussed ways to improve the website and is
> dedicated to doing just that, but I fail to see how hosting the chat
> would serve that purpose well.. The resources available to the
> organization, as I am sure all of you who are members of NAFEX and
> its proceedings are aware, are limited. Constructive suggestions
> certainly be welcomed, I am sure.
> Charlotte Shelton
> Secretary, NAFEX
> Vintage Virginia Apples, LLC
> P. O. Box 210
> North Garden, Virginia 22959
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Greg Miller" <gsmiller at c...>
> To: <nafex at y...>
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:49 PM
> Subject: RE: [nafex] A note of consern about this forum
> > On 24 Jan 2002 at 15:40, Thomas Olenio wrote:
> > > This has been discussed before. The simple answer is to move
> > > entire group and all it's archives to the NAFEX web page.
> > >
> > > The the list will be stable (no more OneList, Egroups, Yahoo
> > > shuffles), and the archives will exist as long as NAFEX.
> > >
> > > But that is for the illustrious leaders of NAFEX to handle.
> > > someone pass me an ice age?
> > This has been discussed in the past, but I'm not sure that moving
> discussion list
> > to a web page is necessarily simple or superior. I assume Tom is
> > discussion groups where members post messages to web-based
> > threads, that are then accessed through that web page.
> > Email offers the following advantages:
> > 1. No need to frequently check the web page to see what messages
> > updated. Messages automatically come to you.
> > 2. Easy ability to store select messages in an email archive.
> > 3. Messages can be downloaded and read later while not connected.
> > 4. More user-friendly for dial-up users (like me) where the time
> loading web
> > pages for each post is much slower than viewing in email.
> > There are advantages to web based message boards
> > 1. Searchable for past articles, including before the readers
> subscription. (However,
> > my archive of saved email messages is also available.)
> > 2. Sorted by collapsable threads (although only to the extent
> message headers
> > are responses and not new topics.)
> > As far as the nuts and bolts, I don't know what software or server
> configuration is
> > necessary for a web based discussion group, or what costs are
> (This list
> > is FREE.) So I will have to defer to others about the difficulty
> setting up a web-
> > based discussion list and or paying for it. (As an aside, if it
> involve costs, I
> > think there are problems with expecting NAFEX to pick up the tab,
> the list has
> > members who are not NAFEX members, and many members who do not
> > in this list.)
> > As Tom correctly notes, the final call on this one is up to the
> some of which
> > are members of this list. Perhaps a motivated and generous
> > handle any associated expenses. And it sounds like we have a
> do the
> > ground work necessary to get it up and keep it running.
> > Even after this gets resolved in the near term, I somehow get the
> that it will
> > be much less than an ice age before this issue comes up again.
> > Greg Miller
> > (Stealth-mode) list administrator
> > Spokane, WA
> > Zone 6
> > ------------------LIST GUIDELINES----------------------
> > 1) Please sign your posting. Include climate and location
> > 2) Attached files will be stripped from your messages. Post
> on the www.YahooGroups.com website.
> > 3) To unsubscribe send a BLANK message to
> > nafex-unsubscribe at y...
> > 4) Include only pertinent comments/questions when replying to a
> and NOT the entire message (especially if the initial posting was
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE credit report with a FREE CreditCheck
Monitoring Service trial
1) Please sign your posting. Include climate and location information if relevent.
2) Attached files will be stripped from your messages. Post attachments on the www.YahooGroups.com website.
3) To unsubscribe send a BLANK message to
nafex-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
4) Include only pertinent comments/questions when replying to a posting and NOT the entire message (especially if the initial posting was large).
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the nafex