[nafex] Re: Noooooo....!!!!!
lostman_amiga at yahoo.com
Wed Jul 11 15:32:23 EDT 2001
--- In nafex at y..., fuwafuwausagi at m... wrote:
> Tom wrote:
> Hi All, Sorry I started this thread, and I end it here.
> Fluffy one, I conceed your point. Sorry to have wasted all this
If I may break in here too...
I agree with bunny on this one too. This is not a waste of bandwith at all.
I am taking special note of this discusssion because I am one of the people
target group of people the original article was taking about.
I am 34 years of age.
First time home owner (for four years)
City dweller (center of Atlanta, GA)
NAFEX member for about six months.
Do I agree with what the article said? Yes - to a large extent.
I dont see a large number of my friends interested in fruit growing
(or growing anything in general) Nor do we have the space in out 1/4 - 1/2
achre lots to do any REAL exporation.
Do I care about where NAFEX is going? Yes! Though I ahve not been a part
of the group long enough to honestly get empassioned by it. I know that by
the time I read my first Pomona, I know I had to get as many back issues as I could.
....and I did.
Why? Just to have them. Though I may not be able or interested in growing
most of the fruits discussed, I quickly realized what a resource this
collection is. I have not discovered yet if my interest in fruit culture is
a fly-by-night affair, or a life long adventure. I guess I will know once I get my
first fruits. I do know that I want NAFEX around. If its just to be able to
email someone to ask a stupid question, or more over to feel that I am not
alone in this adventure and I am not a "off" as my friends think I am.
After reading the article and some of the responce, I kinda feel I need to take a more
active role in promoting the group. If the torch is going to be passed to
my generation, I gous I need to make sure there are people left to pass
These are just comments of the cuff. I just wanted to say, this is a VERY
valid discussion and something, maybe that needs to be revisited from
> My reply:
> Tom, you are the only one showing "passion". Cripes that is why I
> engaged you on this thread hoping to toss others off their apatethic
> As far as I am concerned we are just bantering ideas, I certainly hope
> I am not upsetting you because that is not my intention.
> And if ever bandwidth needed to be wasted, this is one of th emore
> appropriate issues.
> And let me just state it plainly, Tom, I appreciate your concern and
> your willingness to voice your opinion. I may not always agree with
> it, but outside of the fact I think I should be annoited King and all
> should worship me, but I respect it, and th eintelligence behind you
> Kevin (the fluffy bunny)
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the nafex