[Market-farming] Alan Chadwick book from Logosophia: Performance In the Garden
allan.balliett at gmail.com
Fri Feb 15 20:10:07 EST 2013
I'm not at all certain that you understand how established Biodynamic
Along with "Just Do It," which means try it before you condemn it, goes
"The Proof is in the Pudding," which is what brought me into biodynamics.
Here's a wikipedia article on the quality of biodynamic wine, as
demonstrated in professional wine tastings:
Biodynamics may be 'fringe' in the USofA but it is well established around
the world. It has it's own certifying agency, in fact, if I recall
correctly, it is the oldest organic food certifying agency in the world.
It's called DEMETER. US Demeter has been going great guns for the last 10
years, after a very long period of "subtle management."
The US Biodynamic Association (BDA) (the one that can answer "How many
biodynamic farmers does it take to screw in a light bulb") is at
www.biodynamics.com. Biodynamics pre-dates Rodale organics. 75 years for
ON top of all this, I've never been to the farm of a worthwhile organic
grower, a grower of note, one who I sought out to learn something from, who
didn't, it would turne out, use the biodynamics Stella Natura planting
calendar. No scientific proof there. Ask your extension agent "Should I
plant by the moon?" But then ask any experienced farmer or gardener "Does
the moon affect the growth of plants" and you're bound to get substantially
different answers. Sciene says "The Moon doesn't affect plant growth" just
as Science used to say "Humans dream in black and white but THINK they
dream in color."
-Allan in WV
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Richard Robinson <rrobinson at nasw.org>wrote:
> On 2/15/2013 at 3:10:25 PM, Allan Balliett wrote:
> > Nobody, my self included, should be
> > rude to strangers, let along those who appear to want to learn, but the
> > to apply the scientific method to a horticulture system that was
> designed to
> > remediate problems that Science has brought into the land and food can
> > someone who actually practices biodynamics quite angry.
> The scientific method has a pretty good track record of taking specialized
> knowledge out of the hands of a priesthood and putting it into the hands of
> anyone who wants to use its methods. It is also the only system of
> obtaining knowledge that includes an instructional manual for
> systematically uncovering and correcting error in its results, even
> (especially) error by those with most status. To say that science has
> brought problems into the land and food confuses science with greed and
> ignorance. Scientists are not immune from the latter two, but neither are
> the two restricted to scientists, and knowing quite a few of them as I do,
> as a group they tend to be generally less greedy and ignorant than many
> other groups.
> > Let "proof"
> > go and just DO IT!
> Interactions between plants and microbes in the soil (and out of it) are
> so complex that it is tempting to abandon attempts to understand them in
> any scientific way--that is, to understand them in a way that depends on
> observation, hypothesis, and experiment, with constant refinement of one's
> model. But the alternative is to never add to the pool of knowledge in a
> way that reliably advances agriculture. To place biodynamics outside the
> realm of science is to do it, and farmers, no favors.
> Richard Robinson
> Hopestill Farm
> Market-farming mailing list
> Market-farming at lists.ibiblio.org
> Market Farming List Archives may be found here:
> Unsubscribe from the list here (you will need to login in with your email
> address and password):
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Market-farming