market-farming digest: November 10, 2000

Jon Rowley rowley at nwlink.com
Sat Nov 11 12:01:50 EST 2000


Betsy,
Personally I found Marc's comments and tone offensive.  Thanks for the heads up.
Jon Rowley
Seattle
-----Original Message-----
    From: Betsy <ilima at ev1.net>
    To: market farming <market-farming at franklin.oit.unc.edu>
    Date: Saturday, November 11, 2000 8:43 AM
    Subject: Re: market-farming digest: November 10, 2000
    
    
    Marc - I'm baffled by your charge that I'm "trampling" over anyone by apologizing twice. 
    
    Spam has to do with advertising. No-one can be fined for accidentally sending a private, non-commercial e-mail. I understand there are people out there who cannot tolerate views different than their own, and to those people it somehow makes sense to punish differences of opinion, as well as blast others with personal abuse rather than talk about the issues calmly. But thankfully the legal system doesn't work that way.
    
    
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: marc at aculink.net 
        To: market farming 
        Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 10:14 AM
        Subject: Re: market-farming digest: November 10, 2000
        
        
        >
        
        There's an old saying about "it's easier to get
        forgiveness than permission" and it seemed that's
        exactly what you tried to do..
        
        An apology is not acceptable while you continue to trample
        over others after the apology. Like that makes everything
        OK and no one should hold you accountable or protest?
        
        Your message indicated you KNEW you were SPAMMING
        before you hit the send button!
        
        There can be consequences for SPAMMING. If a lot of people
        fowarded your post and a SPAM complaint to your ISP at:
        
        http://www.ev1.net/index.html
        
        you could find yourself the receipient of a hefty bill as many
        service providers have a no spam policy and charge upwards of
        $500 per violation and disconnect of your service as you did agree
        
        to their service policy prior to getting connected with them.
        
        Additionally clogging up the internet with lines to the Florida
        government offices would only serve to get the posts sent
        there ignored and further lower internet email credibility to
        the level of trash.
        
        I do a lot of communications with my State of Colorado Ag
        Department and have had to work quite hard to buuild a
        relationship with them so they will respect my emails regarding
        agriculture as they get so many immediate gratification emails
        like what you are pushing for.
        
        I think you could consider the officials of Florida ARE GOVERNED
        BY FLORIDA LAW - not mindless emails from a faceless mob from
        out of their state they have NO legal or moral obligation to.
        
        They are doing their job as dictated by the Florida Law and the
        Courts.
        
        They ARE recounting  and don't need millions of emails from
        OUT OF STATE PEOPLE to tell them to do what THEY
        ARE ALREADY DOING!!!  Don't you watch the news?
        
        Why would you tell the dog to sit when it already is? It's
        not even your dog.
        
        They are the focus of the most intense scrutiny since Watergate
        and Nixon. Not even during the impeachment investigation and
        pursuit  of Clinton has this much firepower been aimed at an
        internal USA situation.
        
        (If anything I think we should have a nationwide recount.)
        
        Shame.
        
        Marc Nameth
        
        > Subject: sorry again
        > From: "Betsy" <ilima at ev1.net>
        > Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 15:43:49 -0600
        > X-Message-Number: 4
        >
        > This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
        >
        > ------=_NextPart_000_0024_01C04B2D.051BE6A0
        > Content-Type: text/plain;
        >         charset="iso-8859-1"
        > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
        >
        > My apologies once again, although sounds like some of you won't be =
        > accepting them. I edited my e-mail list to try to remove all list-servs =
        > and other inappropriate recipients for the re-vote call. I guess I =
        > missed some. Please note, I don't assume that you would all agree with =
        > me - don't feel you need to tell me you don't. Consider it a wayward =
        > e-mail, mistakes do happen.
        >
        
        
        ---
        You are currently subscribed to market-farming as: ilima at ev1.net
        To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-market-farming at franklin.oit.unc.edu
        Get the list FAQ at: http://www.ibiblio.org/ecolandtech/documents/market-farming.faq
        
        ---
    You are currently subscribed to market-farming as: rowley at nwlink.com
    To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-market-farming at franklin.oit.unc.edu
    Get the list FAQ at: http://www.ibiblio.org/ecolandtech/documents/market-farming.faq 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/market-farming/attachments/20001111/61195d5c/attachment.html 


More information about the Market-farming mailing list