[Homestead] Ideology triumphs over security

Tvoivozhd tvoivozd at infionline.net
Tue Sep 28 23:32:48 EDT 2004

DSanner106 at aol.com wrote:

>In a message dated 9/28/2004 4:23:39 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
>tvoivozd at infionline.net writes:
>No, it is not illegal to fire gay translators in the 
>military or CIA.  
>If they are military, they are not fired, they can be discharged. If they 
>work for the CIA, they are civilians and cannot be fired for their sexual 

tvoivozhd---a distinction without a difference as relates to the 
military, and totally untrue as relates to civilians, i.e.gay and 
lesbians in the entire federal workforce have had their job protections 
officially removed by the Office of Special Counsel. The new Special 
Counsel, Scott Bloch, says his interpretation of a 1978 law intended to 
protect employees and job applicants from adverse personnel actions is 
that gay and lesbian workers are not covered.
Do your homework. The entire federal workforce means the ENTIRE federal 

This conversation took place between Edwards and a newspaper reporter:

You know, we don’t have enough Arabic language translators in this 
country, and a lot of stuff fell through the cracks before 9/11 because 
we weren’t interpreting the chatter, it was kind of put aside because we 
didn’t have enough Arabic language interpreters. So the president 
responds by firing six Arabic language interpreters because they 
happened to be gay ... What kind of national security policy is that?” 
The man asked Dean if he would sign an executive order removing the ban, 
but Dean said that while he would do that, it would do no good since the 
order needs to be reversed by Congress.

More information about the Homestead mailing list