[Homestead] Party of the People

clanSkeen sgian at planetc.com
Fri Sep 3 13:32:07 EDT 2004


COMMENTARY    Dem de la Crème
By KARL ZINSMEISTER
September 2, 2004; Page A12

Democrats: the party of the little guy. Republicans: the party of the
wealthy. Those images of America's two major political wings have been
frozen for generations.

The stereotypes were always a little off, incomplete, exaggerated. (Can you
say Adlai Stevenson?) But like most stereotypes, they reflected rough
truths.

No more. Starting in the 1960s and '70s, whole blocs of "little guys" --
ethnics, rural residents, evangelicals, cops, construction workers,
homemakers, military veterans -- began moving into the Republican column.
And big chunks of America's rich elite -- financiers, academics, heiresses,
media barons, software millionaires, entertainers -- drifted into the
Democratic Party.

The extent to which the parties have flipped positions on the
little-guy/rich-guy divide is illustrated by research from the Ipsos-Reid
polling firm. Comparing counties that voted strongly for George W. Bush to
those that voted strongly for Al Gore in the 2000 election, the study shows
that in pro-Bush counties only 7% of voters earned at least $100,000, while
38% had household incomes below $30,000. In the pro-Gore counties, fully 14%
pulled in $100,000 or more, while 29% earned less than $30,000.

As Daniel Henninger has noted1 on this page, it is "becoming harder by the
day to take the Democrats seriously as the party of the common man." The
financial pillars for Democrats are now super-rich trial lawyers, Hollywood
entertainment executives, and megabuck financiers. Both parties have their
fat cats, obviously, but Federal Election Commission data show that many of
the very wealthiest political players are now in the Democratic column.

Today's most aggressive election donors by far are lawyers. As of July, law
partners had donated $112 million to 2004 political candidates; by
comparison, the entire oil and gas industry donated only $15 million. And
wealthy lawyers now tilt strongly Democratic: 71% of their money goes to
Democrats, only 29% to Republicans.

Wall Street, traditionally thought of as a GOP bastion, is no longer any
such thing. Ultra-income brokers and bankers now give heavily to the party
of Andrew Jackson. Six of the top 15 contributions to Democratic nominee
John Kerry came from partners at firms like Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Morgan
Stanley, and J.P. Morgan.

John Kerry is a perfect embodiment of the takeover of the Democratic Party
by wealthy elites. If elected, he would become the richest man ever to sit
in the White House; experts describe his bloodline as "more royal than any
previous American President"; his educational path was pluperfect upper
crust. And there are now many Democrats like Mr. Kerry -- from Sen. Jon
Corzine to Sen. Jay Rockefeller -- who are simultaneously top of the heap in
wealth and on the left in politics.

Migration of the rich and powerful to the Democrats has been so pronounced,
John Kerry has actually pulled in much more money than sitting President
George Bush this spring and summer. Mr. Kerry's monthly fund-raising totals
have routinely doubled or even tripled Mr. Bush's sums. And while Mr. Bush
has relied heavily on flocks of small donors, the money on the Kerry side
has come much more from well-heeled individuals like the Hamptons
beach-house owners who handed him $3 million in one day at the end of
August.

So, which is the party of the people now?

* * *
America has a long history of distaste for elitism. George Washington
quickly learned that his proud, obstreperous, self-governing Yankee
privates, imbued with a powerful "levelling spirit. . . where the principles
of democracy so universally prevail," would not be dictated to, but had to
be led. From Andrew Jackson to George Bush the elder, U.S. politicians have
known that leaders who put on airs or otherwise separate themselves from
ordinary Americans will be penalized by the electorate.

Reinforcing the egalitarian principles on which our government was founded
is the fact that America (as Daniel Boorstin pointed out) has traditionally
been a culture without a capital. At the time of our founding, more than 95%
of the population lived outside the major cities, and we continue to be a
highly dispersed, localized, and independent-minded people, quite resistant
to bossing from the center.

Average Americans believe elitism is not only wrong in principle, but also
ineffective. And they are correct. A cross-section of everyday people will
generally prove better at solving knotty societal problems than a fraternity
of experts -- as economics writer James Surowiecki demonstrates nicely in
"The Wisdom of Crowds." Careful observers like Friedrich Hayek noted long
ago that ordinary citizens possess forms of knowledge, intuition, and moral
sense that make them better collective arbiters of critical national debates
than any educated elite. This is not just rabble-rousing, but a time-tested
truth that explains much of the success of America and the common people who
have come to her shores.

Once upon a time, America's distaste for elitism translated easily into a
distrust for conservatism. But today, with country-club Republicans having
been swept aside by Nascar Republicans, there is nothing undemocratic about
American conservatism. Among elites, it is now liberalism that is the
dominant creed.

Over the last generation, reports Harvard political scientist Samuel
Huntington, professional elites have become both "less nationalistic" and
"more liberal than the American public. This is revealed by 20 public
opinion surveys from 1974 to 2000." One authoritative study of a dozen
different elites, including top civil servants, lawyers, religious
authorities, military officers, entertainment moguls, union leaders,
non-profit managers, business executives, and media chieftains, found that
every one of these groups but two (businesspeople and the military) was
twice to three times as liberal as the public at large.

It's not as if the Democrats have taken over the top of the socioeconomic
ladder and the Republicans the bottom. Rather, Democrats dominate at the
very upper and lowest rungs, while Republicans find their following in the
middle.

You can see this when slicing the electorate by education as much as by
income. At the bottom, school dropouts and unskilled workers are heavily
Democratic, but so are grad students and professors on the other end of the
educational spectrum. (College faculty groups are the very top financial
contributors to John Kerry, according to Federal Election Commission data.)
Meanwhile, high school graduates and individuals with bachelor's degrees
(the middle) are predominantly Republican.

In the publishing industry, new book imprints and clubs have been founded
recently by several major publishers to cater specifically to politically
conservative readers (who were previously neglected by booksellers). The
publishing industry has been pleasantly surprised by the spending, loyalty,
and depth of the non-liberal reading public. The ambitious conservative
middle has become a mass market too large and too lucrative to ignore.

So we're in an interesting new era. The Right has become a thinking party,
with rich intellectual resources, that is simultaneously dead set against
political elitism and cultural snobbery. Conservatism has laid claim to
America's quiet but multitudinous middle class. And during the same period,
the Left has come to dominate among the overclass and underclass that
bracket the conservative middle.

As a result, the old way of thinking about U.S. politics -- little-guy
Democrats vs. wealthy Republicans -- is about as accurate and relevant today
as a 1930 weather forecast. New fronts have moved in. Expect some major
squalls ahead.

Mr. Zinsmeister, author of "Dawn Over Baghdad" (Encounter Books, 2004), is
editor in chief of The American Enterprise (TAEmag.com2).

 URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB109408551406807625,00.html
 Hyperlinks in this Article:
(1) http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB109235235530790526,00.html
(2) http://www.TAEmag.com

Copyright 2004 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and
use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by
copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please
contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com.






More information about the Homestead mailing list