[Homestead] Lev Navrosov on the betrayal of West to China
tvoivozd at infionline.net
Wed Sep 1 00:54:11 EDT 2004
In Chamberlain Britain, the brainless majority swooned over
Chamberlain's "Peace in our time". Only Churchill saw the
truth---Chamberlain and the brainless majority were enabling their
conquest by Hitler.
Betrayers of Democratic West the Wishful Thinking Majority pre-WWII in
Britain, U.S., same betrayers of freedom in domestic programs of G.W.
Bush in transfer of U.S. economy, economic power, ultimately military
power to China
What if the betrayers of the democratic West turned out to be a majority?
See the Lev Navrozov Archive
By Lev Navrozov
SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM
Lev Navrozov emigrated from the Soviet Union in 1972 He settled in New
York City where he quickly learned that there was no market for his
eloquent and powerful English language attacks on the Soviet Union. To
this day, he writes without fear or favor or the conventions of polite
society. He chaired the "Alternative to the New York Times Committee" in
1980, challenged the editors of the New York Times to a debate (which
they declined) and became a columnist for the New York City Tribune. His
columns are today read in both English and Russian.
August 29, 2004
Communism is the dream of Marx about a society without private property
(except personal belongings like tooth-brushes) and without money,
without the government or the police. Everyone takes free what he needs
(like salt in a diner) and CREATES in science, technology, and the arts,
while all WORK is done by machines.
Early in 1917 the Russian tsar abdicated, the democratic Provisional
Government took over, and mass desertion began at the Russian front of
WWI. Soldiers deserted with their weapons. According to the Provisional
Government, they were deserters to be court-marshaled. According to a
new risen politician named Lenin they were heroes who fought against the
“imperialist war.” So in November of 1917, the deserters, led by Lenin,
overthrew the Provisional Government, and Lenin established his
dictatorship, which in 1991, after 73 years of its existence, had no
more to do with the Communism of Max than it did in 1917. As of 1991,
large-scale means of production were owned by an absolutist ruler or
oligarchy, which was anything but new in history, while consumer goods
were bought, sold, owned, or used privately, which is nothing new
either. Communism was supposed to come, but if the country displayed not
a grain of it in 73 years, when could its advent be expected? Anyway, a
large section of the population did not like what had developed in 73
years, and “the system” collapsed without virtually any resistance.
Those Anglo-American Communists and fellow-travelers who passed secret
nuclear data to Stalin's Russia did it because they were afraid that
having obtained “the atom bomb,” the United States would destroy
COMMUNIST Russia if the latter did not have “the atom bomb” to
retaliate. They were traitors for the sake of Communism.
As I said above, there was not a grain of Communism in Soviet Russia.
These traitors projected their beautiful dream of Communism on Stalin's
Russia, one of the ugliest societies in recorded history.
To what extent these traitors helped Stalin to obtain “the atom bomb” by
1949 is immaterial. The United States did not attack Russia when the
United States had a monopoly on nuclear weapons from 1945 to 1949, and
the United States would not have attacked Russia after 1949 even if
Russia had had no nuclear weapons.
The United States was not the British Empire, which conquered India, but
did not allow Hindus to come and live in Britain. The preemptive
conquest of Russia promised to the United States ruinous expenses and
grievous troubles. What for? Natural resources, such as gold, were not
as valuable as before Adam Smith, who proclaimed that the basis of
national wealth is production. Today it is easy to visualize a
preemptive U.S. war on Stalin's Russia. Multiply the war in Iraq 10 or
So the traitors who passed secret nuclear data to Stalin's Russia were
worried for no reason about the U.S. attack on non-nuclear Russia.
Equally absurd is to consider that Russia from 1917 to 1991 was
“left-wing” in contrast to Hitler's National Socialism which was
allegedly “right-wing.” Yes, American “leftists, including Communists,
believed in their dream of the leftist Soviet Russia versus the
rightist, reactionary, and benighted Nazi Germany. But take, for
example, Robert Hanssen, a traitor of the last quarter of the 20th
century. By his way of life he was a conservative, a right-winger, a
“patriot,” an exemplary church-goer — and a top official of the FBI. He
betrayed the United States to “Communist” Russia, and continued to be a
spy after 1991 as well.
In the past quarter of a century or so the geostrategic situation of
1939–1945 has been reversed. In 1939–1945 it was the United States that
was developing a superweapon in the Manhattan Project, while Germany —
and then Russia after WWII, were eager to know what the United States
had been doing in that field, and Stalin did learn it through a dozen or
so Anglo-American traitors, anxious to save their imaginary Communism in
Russia from the U.S. reactionaries in possession of “the atom bomb.” In
the past quarter of a century it was first Russia that was developing
superweapons from 1970 to 1991, and in 1986 China launched seven
“Manhattan Projects,” that is, the development of seven superweapons in
seven fields, including nanotechnology. The role of traitors in the
United States has been not the passing of secret information about the
U.S. Manhattan Project to first Russia and then China (there has been no
Manhattan Project in the United States for the development of nano
superweapons, such as nanoweapons), but to pretend that such Manhattan
Projects did not exist in Russia from 1970 to 1991 and have not existed
in China since 1986.
Every column of mine on “the China threat” evokes many e-mails. All
these readers are horrified that I am a voice in the wilderness, and
they beg me: “Keep up your good work!” But these readers are not
publicly audible or visible. Yet at least I know that there are true
American patriots, even if publicly inaudible and invisible.
Now, what can be said about those who fill the media and publicly
display their oblivion of “the China threat” while talking for years all
round the clock about the world danger of Iraq's “weapons of mass
destruction,” its future nuclear weapons, and its participation in 9/11?
Those nuclear traitors or the traitor Robert Hanssen did damage to the
United States. But those who deliberately do not notice “the China
threat” or sell to the Chinese dictators whatever is necessary for their
development of post-nuclear superweapons, including nano superweapons,
have been doing a far greater and perhaps fatal damage to the United
States and the West in general.
The tragic irony is that their number is not a dozen, as in the passing
of secret nuclear data to Stalin's Russia, nor one (Robert Hanssen).
They are legion. Possibly a majority of the American people or of the
population of all Western countries.
The only analogy is the oblivion of “the Nazi threat” in the democratic
West until Hitler grabbed the “rump” of Czechoslovakia in 1939. King
Edward VIII of England, who was caught by newsreel cameras giving a Nazi
salute, is a worthy symbol of mass treason (or mass insanity) of the
democratic West before 1939.
Remember the photographs of 1938 depicting the sea of rapturous humanity
flooding the streets of London, and Chamberlain riding through the sea
of joy — he had brought Hitler's signature under their mutual obligation
to keep “the peace in our time.” The car carrying the joyous Chamberlain
can barely move — the English people want to express their joy to the
Fortunately for England, Hitler, after he gobbled up France (with the
British troops in France running for their lives), invaded Russia and
got bogged down.
Otherwise the destiny of Britain could be different and the joy in 1938
would be replaced by the sorrow of the worst defeat in English history.
Even more fortunately for the democratic West, Hitler, instead of
concentrating on the development of nuclear weapons, launched a
conventional war that absorbed all his resources. Otherwise there could
be a poster: one half of it — the Londoners rejoice in 1938 that Hitler
has proved once again that he is a champion of peace, and the other half
— London and New York after the explosion of Hitler's two “atom bombs.”
Traitors are visualized as lonely individuals. This is a delusion. A
nation may be betrayed by its substantial minority, or even by its
majority. Mass self-betrayal, so to speak. Mass traitors betray their
nation and themselves. They are not put on trial. They are judged by
history, and the sentence is mass annihilation or slavery.
* * * * *
For more information about Drexler's Foresight Institute and its
lobbying in Congress, see www.foresight.org
To learn more about the Chris Phoenix report, suggesting a “nano
Manhattan Project,” go to crnano.org.
For information about the Center for the Survival of Western
Democracies, Inc., including how you can help, please e-mail me at
navlev at cloud9.net.
The link to my book online is www.levnavrozov.com. You can also request
our webmaster at levnavrozov.com to send you by e-mail my outline of my book.
It is my pleasant duty to express gratitude to the Rev. Alan Freed, a
Lutheran pastor by occupation before his retirement and a thinker by
vocation, for his help in the writing of this column.
Lev Navrozov's (navlev at cloud9.net] new book is available on-line at
www.levnavrozov.com. To request an outline of the book, send an e-mail
to webmaster at levnavrozov.com.
August 29, 2004
More information about the Homestead