[Cc-uk] FS vs CC?

Neil Leyton nleyton at gmail.com
Thu Jun 23 18:57:39 EDT 2005


Excellent. Thank you. Yes.

Neil

On 6/22/05, Andres Guadamuz <a.guadamuz at ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> I was hoping to keep some of these comments to my blog where they would go
> unnoticed :), but I guess that this discussion is really unearthing some
> deeper problems that I wanted to comment on.
> 
> I am afraid that the arguments that we have been seeing here in the last few
> days are a continuation of the Free vs. Open debate in software. It seems
> clear to me that there is a growing number of criticisms coming from the FS
> camp against the direction of CC, and these remind me of some of the heated
> debates between FS and OSS proponents. I must admit that I find this
> development disturbing because I strongly believe that we must present a
> united front. I think that the next year is going to see an increase in
> organised attacks against CC from the creative industries, and internal
> bickering will get us nowhere. This is not to imply that there should not be
> criticism against CC! By all means, there should be. My problem is that I
> have been noticing a tendency to imply that CC is not kosher from the FS
> perspective, that FS is better, that FS has a more centred philosophy, that
> FS has clearer goals, etc.
> 
> These criticisms may respond to the possibility that FS proponents are
> finally realising that CC is more akin to OSS than to FS. In my view, it
> should be clear that Creative Commons is not Free Software. Both movements
> have different stated goals and have different target audiences. CC is
> attempting to reach and educate the mainstream, and when you do that you
> must be prepared to compromise. There is no reason why CC staff should not
> use proprietary software, and there is no reason why CC should not use
> proprietary standards from time to time if it can be used to reach the
> target audience.
> 
> The mainstream uses proprietary software, this is a fact. We cannot force
> people to use non-proprietary software, even if we think that they should.
> The battle must be won with quality and usability, and we all have to be
> honest that large quantities of FLOSS are not particularly user friendly.
> 
> CC is one of the good guys, it is a step in the right direction (I'm running
> out of clichés). Let's keep that in mind.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Andres
> 
> -------------------------
> Andres Guadamuz
> AHRC Research Centre for Studies in
> Intellectual Property and Technology Law
> Old College, South Bridge
> Edinburgh EH8 9YL
> 
> Tel: 44 (0)131 6509699
> Fax: 44 (0)131 6506317
> a.guadamuz at ed.ac.uk
> http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrb/
> http://technollama.blogspot.com/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cc-uk mailing list
> Cc-uk at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-uk
> 


-- 
www.fadingways.co.uk
www.fwmusicstore.co.uk
www.fadingwaysmusic.com
www.soulrevolutionaries.org/leyton
... and the ever out of date www.neilleyton.com
"It's alright, ma, I'm only bleedin'." -B.D.



More information about the Cc-uk mailing list