[Cc-nz] Time to retire ND and NC
allison.brown at otago.ac.nz
Thu Sep 20 04:44:52 EDT 2012
Kia ora koutou,
> Am I correct that nobody so far has defended ND by offering a specific case of its benefits? Could the benefits of offering a suite of license options be retained if we retire ND, and keep some form of NC?
The reasons I think ND is of benefit to me...
I have personally used ND on a few occasions. This was because I don’t want someone else to remix certain poems without discussing it with me first and it is generally because of the subject matter. Mostly I'm not too worried but it's nice to know on occasion I have that choice - NC and ND are both about choice.
There are so many cases of others ignoring the moral rights of especially artworks, photos and cultural work once things are put online. This provides a framework without having to feel you need to explain why remixing may not be appropriate on occasion. Yes I know some of you may wonder why bother sharing if you won't allow remixing. I assure you there are plenty of artworks worth sharing even if the artist does not want you to remix without discussing it with them first.
Plus do you want a family photo used by someone else (or a company) in a way that makes you uncomfortable - NC and ND addresses that.
Allison Brown • Digital Services Coordinator •
University of Otago Central Library | Te Whare Pukapuka Matua o Te Whare Wānanga o Otāgo • Ōtepoti, Aotearoa • Waea 64 3 479 3961 • Īmera allison.brown at otago.ac.nz • Paetukutuka http://library.otago.ac.nz • Twitter @Initiatives_lib
From: cc-nz-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org [mailto:cc-nz-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Danyl Strype
Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2012 8:15 p.m.
To: Creative Commons Aotearoa New Zealand discussion
Subject: Re: [Cc-nz] Time to retire ND and NC
Kia ora koutou
Paul's question is an interesting one, with two parts:
1a) what CC licensed works originate in Aotearoa?
1b) what works use the CC ANZ localisations of the generic CC licenses?
Another set of related questions which interest me are:
2a) what CC ANZ-licensed works/ CC works generated in Aotearoa have been re-used in a way that would not have been possible had they been under ARR
2b) what CC ANZ-licensed works/ CC works generated in Aotearoa have been re-used in a way that would not have been possible had they been under NC or ND clauses
The first set of questions is a measure of uptake. The second set of questions asks what benefit (if any) that uptake is having.
One example of 2b is the LINZ map data which was released under CC-BY, and has been imported into OpenStreetMap.org (twice, thanks to the OSM license change from CC-BY-SA to Open Data Commons License). NC/ND clauses would have prevented this re-use.
The comments about "moralism" in relation to free culture seem to be coming out of conversations I have not been part of. I certainly think there is an ethical dimension to any discussion of copyright restrictions. I think the onus is on those who support governmental restrictions on the right to copy to erect an ethical defence of said restructions. However, that's a far cry from making a moralistic claim that ARR copyright is "evil", or that anybody who defends it is a "bad person".
I don't think its untrue or unfair to point out that many of the people who defend ARR copyright do so for bad reasons, ie reasons which are based on vested interest and intellectual dishonesty (eg misleading phrases like "intellectual property"), and if there are "bad people" in the world, there certainly a lot of potential gains for them in extending the scope, duration, and means of enforcement available for ARR monopolies, and other private monopolies such as patents. However, I would be the first to admit there are also good reasons for people defending ARR copyright, even if I disagree with them. The same applies to the defence of NC.
Am I correct that nobody so far has defended ND by offering a specific case of its benefits? Could the benefits of offering a suite of license options be retained if we retire ND, and keep some form of NC?
On 18 September 2012 10:45, Matt McGregor <Matt.McGregor at royalsociety.org.nz> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Paul, sorry, didn't mean to dodge this; my earlier answer was meant to
> respond to both of your questions
>>> Do we know how many objects from New Zealand exist with any CC
> We don't have any reliable information on this. As you know, one of the great things about CC is that it's open, which means that users don't have to register before using a licence. This means that tracking licence use--and estimating the amount of licensed objects--can be a headache.
> CCHQ are working on their estimates for a global count at the moment, but that won't be finished for some time. I've no plans to do a NZ version of this at the moment.
"Geeks are those who partake in our culture."
"Uncomfortable alliances are not just necessary; they reflect and speak to the tremendous possibility of our political moment."
- Harmony Goldberg and Joshua Kahn Russell
"Both Marxists and Chicago-school libertarian economists can agree that free software is the best model."
- Keith C Curtis
cc-nz mailing list
cc-nz at lists.ibiblio.org
Creative Commons Aotearoa New Zealand
More information about the cc-nz